Jozzer wrote:Your already the guy to go to for the guys that other guys go to..

Jozzer wrote:Your already the guy to go to for the guys that other guys go to..



liveforphysics wrote:613 unique IP address?
<snip>
Is this over a multi-year period?


liveforphysics wrote:deVries wrote:liveforphysics wrote:And of course Methods certainly deserves great praise.Even if he is a lunatic.
liveforphysics wrote:This is a mis-quote, I never wrote that.

liveforphysics wrote:(I was pro-deleting posts right up to the moment Justin bought the board, not just to the point they started negotiations.)




Blueshift wrote: [speaking of earning revenue] is it possible that someone could even patent something using the information in this site? (not just in the forums but even from a private message someone might send.)

oldpiper wrote:Blueshift wrote: [speaking of earning revenue] is it possible that someone could even patent something using the information in this site? (not just in the forums but even from a private message someone might send.)
IANAL, but if you have seen it here and it works (is not just an "it would be really neat if..." post), then it is in the public domain because this forum is unrestricted for reading, therefore it cannot be patented except by the person who posted it or the original inventor (who would have to supply documentation that s/he did it before it became public knowledge).
Cameron



liveforphysics wrote:Nope. More patents will only mean more corruption, more lawyers getting a payday and more lawyers being created looking for new arteries to vampire dry.


number1cruncher wrote:liveforphysics wrote:Nope. More patents will only mean more corruption, more lawyers getting a payday and more lawyers being created looking for new arteries to vampire dry.
That may be so, but I trust my grandfather's wisdom more than anyone on this board. He was a electrical engineer, patent attorney and patent judge, who spent many years at the PTO. He always advocated for a first to file system, because it would reduce bureaucracy and increase innovation. God rest his soul!
Jozzer wrote:Your already the guy to go to for the guys that other guys go to..



ptd wrote:.ps, if it takes years, it ain't a revolution. it's an adustment period that allows those in power to redistribute their portfolios.



methods wrote:number1cruncher wrote:liveforphysics wrote:Nope. More patents will only mean more corruption, more lawyers getting a payday and more lawyers being created looking for new arteries to vampire dry.
That may be so, but I trust my grandfather's wisdom more than anyone on this board. He was a electrical engineer, patent attorney and patent judge, who spent many years at the PTO. He always advocated for a first to file system, because it would reduce bureaucracy and increase innovation. God rest his soul!
Right - your grandfather is a smart man because he is one of the lawyers making money off of inventors patents. I would trust his wisdom too.![]()
-methods
Tiberius wrote:I thought we already had a first to file system, at least over here. If there is no public disclosure then it's the date of filing that's important.
When I was employed, many years ago, employers would pick up the tab for a patent application. But working for myself, I soon realised the expense and hassle involved. I had a meeting with a patent agent once, and to be honest, it was exactly like dealing with a lawyer and exactly not like dealing with an engineer.
What I've done instead, quite a few times, is to file an initial application myself. That gives me a breathing space (a year in the UK system) but at the expense of public disclosure, and sets a filing date.
Sometimes the issue when you come up with an idea is just to stop someone else patenting it against you, and to make sure you get the kudos. In that case, publishing the idea is a good route, and that's one of the services that ES can provide. I can just see patent lawyers of the future reading the ES archives - at someone else's expense of course.
Nick




Users browsing this forum: d-_-b, Observator and 4 guests