by tapholov » Fri Aug 29, 2008 11:33 am
Hi,
Finally got the 24" rim on the NuVinci hub. Took a few days because one of my cats managed to hide one little spoke out of sight and I couldn't go back to the store right away to get another one.
So, esthetically, there's not that much difference between the 26" and the 24". Just more room under the fender.
One big discovery however was done while the wheel was disassembled because I did put the old wheel back for a while (got to go to work, right!)
Well, I felt I was riding a cloud. The motor pulled like crazy, went quickly to its top speed and actually got its watts at the recommended spot.
Back to the bench.
Using a tachometer, I tested the NuVinci hub. Sure enough there is that 350% difference in wheel speed depending on the setting but the motor certainly turns slower. Let's put this simply. With the wheel totally free to roll, the motor turned at a 1000rpm (read the P.S. note). Without the NuVinci hub, same size wheel, the motor turned at 1500 rpm. Ain't that amazing! The Nuvinci hub steals 33% of the power of the motor.
Translated into riding/power terms, this is why at top speed (42km/h) with the normal wheel, the motor goes from needing 1200W to a comfortable 750W. I could never attain that with the NuVinci. Top speed is 38km/h and the motor always struggles at 1200W. When I think about it, it's not so good, the motor heats up quickly, the controller probably go 'what the hell!!', etc...
On with the 24" wheel.
Well, I got the full range of the NuVinci hub, and at the almost highest ratio right now, the bike goes at 38km/h and I have correspondingly a little more underdrive. While riding up and down trails and doing some flat-ground testing, I was finally able to reduce that power demand (1200W to 750W) but then the bike only goes at 27km/h.
Everything kinda corresponds. The Nuvinci eats up 1/3 of everything, everything else being equal. It's something that might not be readily noticable at low speed but that becomes evident at higher ones.
I need more power and I'll be able to do that once I get the 48V batteries...
But then, the lightness of the regular hub tempts me a lot now and I'm debating where to go next. Using the NuVinci hasn't made the bike a lot more versatile, just heavier. There's more choices but no surprising results. I could compare this to using an automatic versus a standard transmission on a car. Both will get you going but it's really a question of attitude. Yes, the standard transmission will get you out of snowbanks easier but we usually forget that the automatic transmission has a low gear set-up.
That's what I might be aiming towards now. There only needs to be two speeds: high and low and I do know that there's a amazing long post that deals with that (from RC motors to transmissions).
It's all about having a good trail-bike or a good roadster. Different demands that lead to differend set-up/speeds. I'll definitively try the NuVinci with the 48V battery but I'm also thinking about removing the NuVinci hub from the 24" wheel and setting it up for hill-climbing/trail ride with a regular hub. Going up trails at 25/30 km/h isn't bad taking into consideration the uneven terrain. I could alternatively put another gear on the 26" wheel and depending on the situation, flip the chain from one to the other myself.
Anyway, that's in the future. Right now, I'm waiting for those batteries.
Bye for now,
Tapholov
P.S. I have part of the rpm tests on YouTube.com (search for tapholov) and for you purists, I'll mention that the motor should have been going at more than a 1000 rpm. I don't know why the tachometer only showed a 1000. Later tests showed 5000 and then an amazing 10000. It's a small gear to aim at with the laser beam. However, what is important is that all the tests were consistent within a short period, switching gears and switching wheels.