
plasmadust wrote:Any rpm
We can optimise specific rpm and torques by varying the gap between winding and maganet rotors, winding density and the such. Now moving on to a newer and more efficient winding board. Run some fea and you see what happens with flat printed windings and what to do to fix.

plasmadust wrote:I think we may have passed you by on an axial flux motor.
The photo is a cut out of the 1hp prototype. one of the two maganets and a slice of the pc board ''windings'', which are not windings at all can be seen.
The pc board stays put and the two maganet plates rotate on the shaft. Maganet plate is neo pie shaped encapsulated in plastic and bonded to the only matalic part in the motor that serves as return of the flux lines and is what is attached to the shaft.
This thing <2lbs., has no latteral loading, Flux lines weave back and forth, the windings are a printed circuit board, there is nearly NO back emf ( so we use very inexpensive audio grade componets in the controller). No cogging, no noise, no heat and is less expensive to manufacture than any motor ever built.
That's a uniball pen next to the motor, which is 3.250 dia. and little less than 2.00 H.
For stark contrast, second photo is 3MW of the same thing and in production to replace gearboxes and crap that breaks all the time on large wind turbines. Notice the guy walking past the assembly on the left.

The non-sectioned encapsulated magnets, I think. The upper disk is sectioned.fechter wrote:What is the thin disk below the windings?


Ref: viewtopic.php?p=557247#p557247Miles wrote:rhitee05 wrote:This actually won't matter. I can't demonstrate this without full 3D modeling, but the flux won't be limited to just the narrow lower section of the core - it will spread across the entire volume of the core, so any worry about the narrow section of the core saturating first are mostly unnecessary.Miles wrote:Magnet shape modified to give a more equal flux density across the laminations.
I guess I just assumed that it would stay separated because of the reluctance of the inter-laminar insulation. Or, do you mean that it spreads across only as each lamination approaches saturation?



flathill wrote:plasmadust wrote:Any rpm
We can optimise specific rpm and torques by varying the gap between winding and maganet rotors, winding density and the such. Now moving on to a newer and more efficient winding board. Run some fea and you see what happens with flat printed windings and what to do to fix.
You wouldn't happen to work for these guys?
http://www.boulderwindpower.com/the-bwp ... cb-stator/
I think the motors are so efficient they can use low temp grade neo out of California (no dysprosium need)

plasmadust wrote:We have made this and it is in production at Core Outdoor Power.
http://www.coreoutdoorpower.com for a better view than a cut up proto type.

Miles wrote:Accepting some imbalance, I'm leaning towards increasing the number of turns from 4 to 6 and missing out the first half turn from the first module of each phase. Might as well gain the advantage of losing an endturn, too![]()
Reasonable compromise?










TylerDurden wrote:Bling!


You'd think so but apparently not, which is why they are gold plated silverfechter wrote:Solid gold windings should have less resistance than copper.




Platinum plated Cobalt alloyTylerDurden wrote:And the stator lams?

Miles wrote:You'd think so but apparently not, which is why they are gold plated silverfechter wrote:Solid gold windings should have less resistance than copper.
Ref: http://www.thecarpcstore.com/cms/index. ... &Itemid=68

