The steepest hills

Get real world experience and user feedback on the electric bicycle products.

Postby lemmiwinks » Tue Apr 17, 2007 11:22 pm

fechter wrote:Holy S*it! - that's a steep hill.
I'd be afraid to go down that.


My thoughts exactly! Especially in the wet, those cobblestones or whatever they are don't inspire much confidence.
User avatar
lemmiwinks
100 W
100 W
 
Posts: 255
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: Australia

Postby fechter » Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:47 pm

I took my Vego up a local street called Esmeyer Drive in San Rafael.
I was able to motor up to the highest part at around 15mph.

On the way down, my brakes almost completely faded.

Here's the profile of the hill using National Geograpic Topo:

The upper portion is an AVERAGE 15% grade.
Attachments
Esmeyer Grade 1.jpg
Esmeyer Grade 1.jpg (23.68 KiB) Viewed 1888 times
Esmeyer Grade 2.jpg
Expanded view of the steep part
Esmeyer Grade 2.jpg (27.4 KiB) Viewed 1889 times
"One test is worth a thousand opinions"
User avatar
fechter
100 GW
100 GW
 
Posts: 9356
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 3:23 pm
Location: California Bay Area, USA

Postby Lowell » Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:56 pm

I tried Royal Oak hill in Burnaby, BC the other day and managed a steady 57km/h heading south between Deer Lake Parkway and Kingsway. I looked online, but couldn't find any info on percent grade. Anyone know where to find that info?
Lowell
1 MW
1 MW
 
Posts: 1830
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: Vancouver

Postby Lowell » Tue Apr 24, 2007 5:20 pm

Image
Lowell
1 MW
1 MW
 
Posts: 1830
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: Vancouver

Postby Lowell » Tue Apr 24, 2007 5:23 pm

It turns out the city of Burnaby has fantastic topographical data on their web site! The middle of Royal Oak ave has exactly 12.77% grade. So my bike goes 35.4mph up a 12.8% grade carrying a 7lb charger/rack assembly and my work backpack of about 10lbs.


Lowell wrote:Image
Lowell
1 MW
1 MW
 
Posts: 1830
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: Vancouver

Postby Lowell » Tue Apr 24, 2007 5:55 pm

Stewardson Way in New Westminster, BC: 55ft rise in 1290ft = 4.26%. My best speed up that hill is 47.8mph, and at that speed wind and an aero tuck make a big difference. Normally I top out around 44-45mph up that hill in comfort.

Image
Lowell
1 MW
1 MW
 
Posts: 1830
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: Vancouver

Postby EbikeMaui » Tue May 08, 2007 4:11 am

The video didn't have the wide angle so when climbing the hill it was pointed at the ground too much.The trip included going down to the ocean then back to where I started in 11.1 miles using 6.4 amp hours on 72 volt pack.Also using one gear ratio.You may notice that it took anout 4 amp hours to go about 4 miles up a average 20* grade.with a 2000 ft elevation rise in 2o minutes.Now lets see a hub motor ebike do the same.

http://tinyurl.com/ynsh69


Here is the video..
http://tinyurl.com/3ad8g2
http://tinyurl.com/yp8378
Attachments
drawGraph.png
drawGraph.png (650 Bytes) Viewed 1820 times
Efficiency and longevity Rules!
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=ecyclemaui
User avatar
EbikeMaui
1 kW
1 kW
 
Posts: 445
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:57 pm

Postby Lowell » Tue May 08, 2007 4:15 am

Isn't this the exact same post as the one in the thread right below this one??
Lowell
1 MW
1 MW
 
Posts: 1830
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: Vancouver

Postby EbikeMaui » Wed May 09, 2007 6:08 pm

Lowell wrote:Isn't this the exact same post as the one in the thread right below this one??
The point is Where is there any video of a hub motor ebike climbing a 2000 ft rise in less than 18 minutes ?On the dirt pedaling or not ?
Efficiency and longevity Rules!
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=ecyclemaui
User avatar
EbikeMaui
1 kW
1 kW
 
Posts: 445
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:57 pm

Postby TylerDurden » Wed May 09, 2007 6:36 pm

I'm confused...

is that a 4mi run with a 2000' rise?

that would work out to a 9.4% grade.

4 x 5280 = 21120 2000/21120 = .0946

:?:
Have a Nice Day,

TD

Image
___________________________________________________________

FYI: Adding pictures?

Bored?... take a crack at the unanswered posts

Please post your Watts-at-speed in the survey.



Image
User avatar
TylerDurden
100 GW
100 GW
 
Posts: 8540
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:50 pm
Location: Wear the fox hat.

Postby Lowell » Wed May 09, 2007 8:18 pm

Seems like every time a story is retold, the grade becomes a little steeper... :lol:
Lowell
1 MW
1 MW
 
Posts: 1830
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: Vancouver

Postby EbikeMaui » Wed May 09, 2007 8:48 pm

Lowell wrote:Seems like every time a story is retold, the grade becomes a little steeper... :lol:
If the steepest part of the was 30% and you couldn't do that what would the average grade matter?
Efficiency and longevity Rules!
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=ecyclemaui
User avatar
EbikeMaui
1 kW
1 kW
 
Posts: 445
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:57 pm

Postby TylerDurden » Wed May 09, 2007 8:59 pm

EbikeMaui wrote:
Lowell wrote:Seems like every time a story is retold, the grade becomes a little steeper... :lol:
If the steepest part of the was 30% and you couldn't do that what would the average grade matter?


For the sake of discussion we can say the average is 10%.

18mph, 50lb MTB, 160lb rider, 10% grade = 976 watts to the road... for 20min continous.

Seems like it might be doable...

:)
Have a Nice Day,

TD

Image
___________________________________________________________

FYI: Adding pictures?

Bored?... take a crack at the unanswered posts

Please post your Watts-at-speed in the survey.



Image
User avatar
TylerDurden
100 GW
100 GW
 
Posts: 8540
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:50 pm
Location: Wear the fox hat.

Postby EbikeMaui » Thu May 10, 2007 4:33 pm

TylerDurden wrote:
EbikeMaui wrote:
Lowell wrote:Seems like every time a story is retold, the grade becomes a little steeper... :lol:
If the steepest part of the was 30% and you couldn't do that what would the average grade matter?


For the sake of discussion we can say the average is 10%.

18mph, 50lb MTB, 160lb rider, 10% grade = 976 watts to the road... for 20min continous.

Seems like it might be doable...

:)
Get out the Xlyte dyno caculator to see how a loaded hub motor reacts at 18 mph burning up half of the 9oo watts in heat.Better yet lets a ViDEO of a 2000 ft rise climb no matter how long it takes.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 2082053937
Efficiency and longevity Rules!
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=ecyclemaui
User avatar
EbikeMaui
1 kW
1 kW
 
Posts: 445
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:57 pm

Postby wren » Thu May 10, 2007 5:17 pm

DanEL wrote:
I live near Pittsburgh PA.

...

Lycras criticize me for desiring a pedal-assist bike for commuting.

...

I don't think they have any idea of what the hills are like around here - not miles long like you would find in the Rockies but very, very steep with no flat parts.

I'm hoping that pedelecs, ebikes (whatever) get more popular around here. We've got great bike trails (former railroad tracks) but the roads sure could be made more bike friendly.


DanEL,

Absolutely! I'm from Pittsburgh as well. The hills are the main reason I'm adding electric assist. They're also the reason I've purchased gears for the project. The secondary reason for an electric assist is to better maintain speed with the flow of traffic, since it's often necessary to take the lane around here.

I'm more than a little disappointed that an e-bike with gears may not be legal in Pennsylvania.

Anyway, here are some more Pittsburgh hills (just listing some above 20%).

    37% Canton Avenue
    32% Dornbush Street
    29% Boustead Street
    28% East Woodford Avenue
    24% Rialto Street
    23% Hampshire Avenue
    22% Capital Avenue
    22% Fallowfield Avenue
    22% Potomac Avenue
    21% Flatbush Avenue
    21% Belasco Avenue
    20% Walbridge Street
    20% Dagmar Avenue
User avatar
wren
1 mW
1 mW
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:14 pm

Postby Lowell » Thu May 10, 2007 5:19 pm

Those are some pretty mean hills! What's the typical length?
Lowell
1 MW
1 MW
 
Posts: 1830
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: Vancouver

Postby EbikeMaui » Thu May 10, 2007 5:31 pm

wren wrote:
DanEL wrote:
I live near Pittsburgh PA.

...

Lycras criticize me for desiring a pedal-assist bike for commuting.

...

I don't think they have any idea of what the hills are like around here - not miles long like you would find in the Rockies but very, very steep with no flat parts.

I'm hoping that pedelecs, ebikes (whatever) get more popular around here. We've got great bike trails (former railroad tracks) but the roads sure could be made more bike friendly.


DanEL,

Absolutely! I'm from Pittsburgh as well. The hills are the main reason I'm adding electric assist. They're also the reason I've purchased gears for the project. The secondary reason for an electric assist is to better maintain speed with the flow of traffic, since it's often necessary to take the lane around here.

I'm more than a little disappointed that an e-bike with gears may not be legal in Pennsylvania.

Anyway, here are some more Pittsburgh hills (just listing some above 20%).

    37% Canton Avenue
    32% Dornbush Street
    29% Boustead Street
    28% East Woodford Avenue
    24% Rialto Street
    23% Hampshire Avenue
    22% Capital Avenue
    22% Fallowfield Avenue
    22% Potomac Avenue
    21% Flatbush Avenue
    21% Belasco Avenue
    20% Walbridge Street
    20% Dagmar Avenue
Dam ! The world is NOT flat after all.
Efficiency and longevity Rules!
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=ecyclemaui
User avatar
EbikeMaui
1 kW
1 kW
 
Posts: 445
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:57 pm

Postby knoxie » Thu May 10, 2007 5:54 pm

Hi Randy

Yes it is good going up a 20% grade using only that much power and yes your system is efficient nobody is denying that but most people don't need their bikes to do this? also the hub motor geared or not is far simpler than what you have done for people to add to their bikes.

Your concept is a good one Randy there is no doubt and maybe it would work as a mass production bike system if made properly again nobody would argue that however as an add on kit its a little more impractical and as most people don't need the sort of hill climbing ability that you need then there is a very limited market for a dual chain driven kit with an expensive hub, you may have the skills but most e-bikers are not as practical, like them or loathe them the simple hub motor even with all its inefficiency is a good all rounder?

10 million sold last year in China alone!!

You have been talking up this system for so long now we all know about it Randy and again yes its a good idea but your constant bragging just wears people down, when folks have spent 1000's of dollars on e-bike kit and come here for some friendly advice they dont need to be told they have bought a pile of shit when they havent? as they don't need motors to climb volcanoes.

Also Randy don't forget your bike in most countries would be illegal due to its output power, I doubt it would climb any better than any current geared alternative at 250-500W and again its illegal to use on the road around your volcanoes again not much Market for it in Hawaii. I cant see the Chinese changing their designs any time soon Randy.

I agree with you that gears are a better option for hill climbing than none geared systems, that's why I also use gears as well on my USPD and in the Puma, I haven't found a hill yet that I have slowed under 10mph and can climb using similar power to what you are using.

Its a shame Randy as maybe with a bit more diplomacy you may have been able to get your system off the ground properly a few years back but if you treated your business partners the same way you do the folks on this board I very much doubt you would get past the first meeting.

Leopard spots etc etc.

Knoxie
User avatar
knoxie
100 MW
100 MW
 
Posts: 2605
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 5:54 pm
Location: UK

Postby EbikeMaui » Thu May 10, 2007 6:17 pm

Also Randy don't forget your bike in most countries would be illegal due to its output power,Knoxie

...........................
So is any hub motor that is overvolted with out a limiter.The rest is only your opinion and others who are in deninal about hub motor use on hills.
Efficiency and longevity Rules!
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=ecyclemaui
User avatar
EbikeMaui
1 kW
1 kW
 
Posts: 445
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:57 pm

Postby Lowell » Thu May 10, 2007 9:58 pm

10 million hub motors sold? That's a lot of asses! :lol:

I think someone is just bitter that the world doesn't see ebikes his way. 10 million people must be wrong... :roll:
Lowell
1 MW
1 MW
 
Posts: 1830
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: Vancouver

Postby Stevil_Knevil » Thu May 10, 2007 11:13 pm

Image

Ten million -and counting.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ride Bikes. Drive Culture. -S
User avatar
Stevil_Knevil
10 kW
10 kW
 
Posts: 770
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:32 pm
Location: Up where the air is fresh and clean

Postby Toorbough ULL-Zeveigh » Fri May 11, 2007 1:21 am

I can see Randy 25 years from now in his rocking chair on his front porch, angrily waving his fist at kids passing by on their ebikes, "Don't you young whippersnaps know you're not hovering efficiently!! I have the world's most efficient ebike ever made locked up in my garage."

:lol:
the pessimist engineer sees a glass that’s twice as big as it needs to be.
the optimist engineer sees that the glass has a 100% safety tolerance.
http://what-if.xkcd.com/6/

there is zero consequence to ignoring ayn rand
User avatar
Toorbough ULL-Zeveigh
10 MW
10 MW
 
Posts: 2336
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:02 am
Location: Marlboro

Postby Lowell » Fri May 11, 2007 2:37 am

Toorbough ULL-Zeveigh wrote:I can see Randy 25 years from now in his rocking chair on his front porch, angrily waving his fist at kids passing by on their ebikes, "Don't you young whippersnaps know you're not hovering efficiently!! I have the world's most efficient ebike ever made locked up in my garage."

:lol:


Hahahahah.... :lol: :lol:

I rode into Vancouver tonight to drop off some paperwork to a tenant, and as I was climbing the lower section of Knight St. hill (8.0% grade, 82.5ft in 1025ft on the steepest section) at over 45mph I was thinking to myself "This hub motor sucks! I should have built a 5lb motor with gears so I can enjoy the scenery!"

Total climb of 308.4ft, and is the biggest hill I ever have to ride over without going out of my way. 47.8km travelled using 1420Wh, MaxS 86km/h, AvgS 39.7km/h. Damn traffic and red lights... still faster than driving a car in the city though!
Lowell
1 MW
1 MW
 
Posts: 1830
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: Vancouver

Postby wren » Fri May 11, 2007 11:10 am

Wow, I didn't realize what I was stepping into. Anyway, this will be my first e-bike project. It's possible that a hub motor will meet my needs. Hub motors seem to work well for many people in many areas. I would love to hear from anyone who has used a hub motor in my area. I had originally considered a 406/409 and more recently an X5. I first started looking into an e-bike conversion in 2004. At the time, I exchanged some e-mails with Joshua Goldberg regarding the 406/409. Shortly there after, I was in an automobile accident that kept me off the street for two and a half years.

Honestly, I don't mind adding gears. I think it will be a fun project. I'm fortunate enough to have access to the university's shop. So, I'm in a position to machine motor mounts and the like. Also, I suspect that I'll get better performance and efficiency in this city. I could be wrong. I consider the area somewhat exceptional in this regard. Bicycling Magazine once rated Pittsburgh one of the worst cities for biking citing the hills and the lack of bicycle lanes. Also, I'm rolling the dice on this being more economical even outside of battery costs as I may avoid spending money twice: once to try a hub and then again to try gears.

I have no interest in bragging, and I'm certainly not knocking hub motors. Just having some fun, and hopefully transforming my bike into something that can serve as my primary form of transportation. Now, I'm actually quite serious about primary bicycle transportation, fun aside. My spine was damaged in 2004, and I find the seat of my recumbent to be considerably more comfortable than the seat of my car. I've come to loath driving. Spinning helps too as I cramp up if I sit still. Plus, I need to do a minimum of 30 minutes of solid pedaling daily for PT anyway.

Lowell wrote:Those are some pretty mean hills! What's the typical length?


Well, I'm most familiar with Rialto. The truly nasty section is just over 1/10th of a mile. However, it continues going up hill after that. Also, it's going to be hard to get a running start. In addition to the traffic light, the road jogs coming off the bridge at the base of the hill. The terrain is generally hilly even outside of the nasty sections. Still, some of the nasty sections are a must for me, such as Rialto.

What do you think, would a hub motor work here in a bike intended as a primary vehicle?

By-the-by, I now have a way to make the motor's gears legal in Pennsylvania. So, I haven't scrapped the plan just yet.

Anyway, I think I'll avoid the hub vs geared debate, but I'll happily absorb any input on the matter.
User avatar
wren
1 mW
1 mW
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 2:14 pm

Postby Lowell » Fri May 11, 2007 11:46 am

If you want to climb steep hills slowly, gear reduction is a must, but unless you have multi gears or plenty of voltage, top speed will suffer.

Use the power/speed calculator to figure out how much power you need to go up your favorite grade at your desired speed, and then see how it matches up on the hub motor simulator. A 5304 in a 20" wheel would be a very good hill climber if you want simplicity.
Lowell
1 MW
1 MW
 
Posts: 1830
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: Vancouver

PreviousNext

Return to E-Bike Reviews & Testing

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Lightfeet and 4 guests