Engine braking = regen braking in ebike !?

Get all your technical information about electric bikes here.

Engine braking = regen braking in ebike !?

Postby The7 » Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:24 am

Engine braking in car = regen braking in ebike!?

Engine braking is not permitted for trucks (over a certain weight) for long decending downhill. Why?
If so, should we use regen braking in ebike? Why?
User avatar
The7
10 kW
10 kW
 
Posts: 774
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Vancouver

Re: Engine braking = regen braking in ebike !?

Postby safe » Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:00 am

The7 wrote:Engine braking in car = regen braking in ebike!?

Engine braking is not permitted for trucks (over a certain weight) for long decending downhill. Why?
If so, should we use regen braking in ebike? Why?


I proved over in the Induction Motor Braking thread that if you want to equal the braking force of high quality disc brakes (that can skid the tires) you would need to be able to create a regenerative braking force of:

:arrow: 8 horsepower

The problem is that the laws are designed so that the maximum forward motion force is supposed to be 1 horsepower. So you have a factor of eight difference between the way the motor is supposed to be designed for forward motion verses how the motor needs to work in braking motion.

So I just don't see regenerative braking as a serious idea... you could recapture a sliver of energy if you regen as you go downhill, but it's not a really powerful braking force... at least not compared to something that can skid the FRONT tire. (the rear tire can often skid at very low braking forces because the weight gets shifted forwards)

The permanent magnet type of motor has a higher intitial braking force, but it ends up becoming somewhat of a constant.

Here's a thought.... what if you could somehow "downshift" your permanent magnet motor so that it's forced to overrev WAAAAAAY past it's no load peak area. That way the motor is being slowed down by the permanent magnet backemf. While at low speeds the permanent magnets backemf would only be 1 horsepower but if you could seriously overrev the motor (like 3-4 times) then the back emf would shoot through the roof...
User avatar
safe
100 GW
100 GW
 
Posts: 6700
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 12:14 pm

Postby Rassy » Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:48 pm

The7 said
Engine braking is not permitted for trucks (over a certain weight) for long decending downhill. Why?
If so, should we use regen braking in ebike? Why?


I think "unmuffled" engine braking is not allowed because it is a noise maker. I.e., it has nothing to do with safety and is usually posted in populated areas.

IMO regen braking on an ebike is a great thing to do. I am just watching for a good and inexpensive way to deal with the electricity produced.
-Rassy-
Two Tadpole Trikes, 6X10 9C mid drive, NuVinci CVT Auto Shift, 48V LiFePO4
viewtopic.php?f=28&t=18606
viewtopic.php?f=28&t=47043
User avatar
Rassy
100 kW
100 kW
 
Posts: 1485
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 10:58 am
Location: Southern Oregon Coast, USA

Postby OneEye » Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:12 am

That's what I thought, too, Rassy. You WANT trucks to be able to engine brake on the long hills, it saves the brake pads from overheating and failing or locking up. The Jake Brake is quite noisy though, so populated areas will often post no engine braking as you move through the city/town.
OneEye
100 W
100 W
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:29 am
Location: California - central valley

Postby The7 » Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:32 am

Wonder if there is any safety issue of engine braking for trucks besides noise?
User avatar
The7
10 kW
10 kW
 
Posts: 774
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Vancouver

Postby OneEye » Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:03 am

Primarily it's an engine/transmission wear and noise issue. Using the jake brake is safer as it leaves the regular drum & disk brakes cool and ready for use. As friction brakes heat up they provide less braking power.

In this white paper (from Australia) they are discussing whether the safety risk of PROHIBITING engine braking in certain areas is acceptable. The underlying (unstated) assumption/fact is engine brakes are a safe option, particularly for long downhill decents.

http://www.ntc.gov.au/filemedia/Reports ... an2006.pdf

4 Contribution of Engine Brakes to Safe Braking

4.1 General Considerations

Auxiliary brakes can contribute to both road safety and transport efficiency by taking the load off the service brakes. The safety implications of operating a vehicle with and without an engine compression brake will be assessed.
OneEye
100 W
100 W
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:29 am
Location: California - central valley

Postby fechter » Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:31 pm

On steep grades, the friction brakes on a large truck can easily fade and result in a runaway. Using the engine brake allows the friction brakes to cool and regain their effectiveness (or prevent them from getting hot in the first place). Noise is the main problem as far as I can tell.
"One test is worth a thousand opinions"
User avatar
fechter
100 GW
100 GW
 
Posts: 9357
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 3:23 pm
Location: California Bay Area, USA

Postby TylerDurden » Wed Sep 26, 2007 12:46 pm

big waste of energy. They should compress air in insulated tanks and use it for boost on the uphills.

:?
Have a Nice Day,

TD

Image
___________________________________________________________

FYI: Adding pictures?

Bored?... take a crack at the unanswered posts

Please post your Watts-at-speed in the survey.



Image
User avatar
TylerDurden
100 GW
100 GW
 
Posts: 8540
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:50 pm
Location: Wear the fox hat.

Postby mastermarc » Tue Oct 02, 2007 1:55 pm

well supposedly they already do that in some of the UPS trucks.
mastermarc
1 µW
1 µW
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 1:01 pm

Postby The7 » Fri Oct 05, 2007 1:10 pm

mastermarc wrote:well supposedly they already do that in some of the UPS trucks.


Could you state the source of this info?
User avatar
The7
10 kW
10 kW
 
Posts: 774
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:07 pm
Location: Vancouver

Postby agent86 » Fri Oct 05, 2007 3:29 pm

Nashbar steel mtb frame built with
LX derailleurs and trekking crank (48/38/26).
Rear XLyte Cannon. 36V20A
agent86
10 mW
10 mW
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 4:09 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, UT

Postby TylerDurden » Fri Oct 05, 2007 8:51 pm

Have a Nice Day,

TD

Image
___________________________________________________________

FYI: Adding pictures?

Bored?... take a crack at the unanswered posts

Please post your Watts-at-speed in the survey.



Image
User avatar
TylerDurden
100 GW
100 GW
 
Posts: 8540
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:50 pm
Location: Wear the fox hat.


Return to E-Bike Technical

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: scphantm and 9 guests