BTW Jay, it's been a few years and I admit I haven't kept track of your ebike exploits

Sacman wrote:First thing that I thought about when I saw your PCB was that structurally... it resembles a "rolling bridge". Bending moment forces on structural members on bridges are highest at midspan. So I hope your connections at the middle (where you joined both bikes) are good and strong. When they cut Lincoln Town Cars in half and add a section in the middle to make a sretch limosine they also normally beef up the frame members at the middle. Since you've been riding it now for a while you should be okay but for your kids sake... keep an eye on the frame parts towards the middle.
it resembles a "rolling bridge". Bending moment forces on structural members on bridges are highest at midspan

Dee Jay wrote:it resembles a "rolling bridge". Bending moment forces on structural members on bridges are highest at midspan
Huh? Engrish Prease..!

I have many projects floating around in my head and I was waiting for something to form, something I can obsess about cos it's the only way I can get started. Flights of fancy type of projects has slowly dropped down on my To Do List, I generally lost a lot of my creative spirit after the disaster last march. I'm trying to get the motivation back but I think I'm more in a survival mode than the arts mode so the Altermotor I was gonna use on the Revive is gonna have to wait. The 408 WAS gonna go on the PCB maybe as a mid drive but along came the vacuum motor so I'm have to try that first. I get the feeling it'll burn out, that'll give me the chance to try my hand at rewinding a small motor as opposed to a crystalyte 4011. I shouldn't have messed with the 4011.Sacman wrote:So you eventually gonna put a motor on the PCB or keep it a push bike? Where's the old 408 and 406?

Sacman wrote:So you eventually gonna put a motor on the PCB or keep it a push bike? Where's the old 408 and 406?


amberwolf wrote:wouldn't it be better if you got it really cold so it contracts?


Thanks dude! I seem to approach almost everything I do from an artistic perspective first, efficiency and practicality BE DAMNED.ohzee wrote:Your bike looks awesome Dee Jay. I am very impressed with what you have done.
Thanks for sharing it with us.

Dee Jay wrote:amberwolf wrote:wouldn't it be better if you got it really cold so it contracts?
heat or cold? you know I've always been fuzzy about that...![]()
I guess I pictured cracking the rust that's fused between the pieces as the metals expand.
how would you apply extreme cold without freon?

amberwolf wrote:Dee Jay wrote:amberwolf wrote:wouldn't it be better if you got it really cold so it contracts?
heat or cold? you know I've always been fuzzy about that...![]()
I guess I pictured cracking the rust that's fused between the pieces as the metals expand.
how would you apply extreme cold without freon?
Well, I haven't actually done very much with interference fit of things, so I might be wrong--heat might be what you want. But if you want to make it cold, it's possible that just putting it in the freezer for a few hours might do it.
Or you could get some dry ice and pack it in that in an ice chest.
For really extreme, find some place that will let you play with their liquid nitrogen.


tube around the axle on one end for one side of the press to push on the stator, and the axle on the other side of the press.
I would expect the press to push it out no matter which way it was done.

Dee Jay wrote:Sacman wrote:So you eventually gonna put a motor on the PCB or keep it a push bike? Where's the old 408?
2) Some people already know how I feel about "torque arms".. hate em.. especially on the fork, hub motors are dangerous on the fork even with torque arms IMO, it's why I wanted a chain drive, not the 408.
Dee Jay wrote:...my biggest gripe about these hub kits is you have to fab your own torque arms. fck-tht-sht. These hub motors have to be redesigned to eliminate the need for torque arms.

Sacman wrote:Dee Jay wrote:Sacman wrote:So you eventually gonna put a motor on the PCB or keep it a push bike? Where's the old 408?
2) Some people already know how I feel about "torque arms".. hate em.. especially on the fork, hub motors are dangerous on the fork even with torque arms IMO, it's why I wanted a chain drive, not the 408.
Oh too bad... I have a front 408 hubmotor (that I don't know I'm going to do with) and was I was going to donate it to you for the PCB. I made the switch over to geared hubmotors about 3 years ago on my 3rd ebike build and have never looked back to DD hubmotors. They're smaller, lighter and have way more torque than DD's, and I luv that they freewheel allowing you to pedal without all the drag that DD's have.Dee Jay wrote:...my biggest gripe about these hub kits is you have to fab your own torque arms. fck-tht-sht. These hub motors have to be redesigned to eliminate the need for torque arms.
I myself don't have any problems with hubmotors. I've always understood most bike frames have dropouts that were never really designed to handle high axle torque generated by hubmotors to begin with. So I have no problems with beefing up the frames by having to custom fab a torque arm. It's waaaaay easier and lot less hassle than trying to figure out the complicated gearing, multiple chains and sprockets, or trying to fab custom brackets (that required much more critical alignment) when making a mid-drive or RC setup.



Return to E-Bike General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: bowlofsalad, TRIGON391, Wummi and 12 guests