
Farfle wrote:I need to go thrash it around and get a screenshot, but the air cooled doublepie with my inexperienced 200 pound self has exceeded 200wh/mile average on the socal racetrack, it did overheat but not to the point of destruction, The temp sensor did pass 190C (thank you 220C rated wire![]()
). BUT about 1KW of the heat its making is iron losses due to a construction error, so when I get in two more pies ill have to do another test.

Not sure what you mean? For a given torque output, copper losses will be the same, no matter how you wind it (assuming equal fill factor).whatever wrote:this is a bit off topic but.... if a hubmotor is getting hot and needs to be cooled, is it not better to rewind it to suit the power level being used? Would save alot of wasted energy

andynogo wrote:Farfle wrote:I need to go thrash it around and get a screenshot, but the air cooled doublepie with my inexperienced 200 pound self has exceeded 200wh/mile average on the socal racetrack, it did overheat but not to the point of destruction, The temp sensor did pass 190C (thank you 220C rated wire![]()
). BUT about 1KW of the heat its making is iron losses due to a construction error, so when I get in two more pies ill have to do another test.
I know it's bit off topic...but... what was the construction error that led to the excess heat? Are the stator laminations shorted together or something?



whatever wrote:this is a bit off topic but.... if a hubmotor is getting hot and needs to be cooled, is it not better to rewind it to suit the power level being used? Would save alot of wasted energy
Miles wrote:Not sure what you mean? For a given torque output, copper losses will be the same, no matter how you wind it (assuming equal fill factor).
whatever wrote:Miles a hub motor is going to get hot if its overvolted, run within specs should be negligible heat.
Instead of cooling rewind for the amp/volts that are intended for it. Number of turns and thickness of wire are the main two variables, effect on torque I have no idea, but there should be some formulas out there to find out.

whatever wrote:Miles a hub motor is going to get hot if its overvolted, run within specs should be negligible heat.
Instead of cooling rewind for the amp/volts that are intended for it. Number of turns and thickness of wire are the main two variables, effect on torque I have no idea, but there should be some formulas out there to find out.

whatever wrote:Miles a hub motor is going to get hot if its overvolted, run within specs should be negligible heat.
Instead of cooling rewind for the amp/volts that are intended for it. Number of turns and thickness of wire are the main two variables, effect on torque I have no idea, but there should be some formulas out there to find out.




Compromising a lot of things. Not very good for high power application and not usable in all motor designs.whatever wrote:here is a very interesting idea for high effeciency at low rpm only winding each second stator



hjns wrote:Hi dfar,
That is a huge plug. Doesn't it interfere with rotation of the motor?






dfar wrote:On my other motor I run regen braking so I don't use a back brake caliper so no worries about clearance there.

John in CR wrote:AW,
I hope I can count on you for the needed test info pervasively lacking, which is with and without oil no-load current and no-load speed. It will be important for determining optimum fill levels. I think the warmish covers is good in your test so far, but that's as long as much of the heat isn't new.



hjns wrote:dfar wrote:On my other motor I run regen braking so I don't use a back brake caliper so no worries about clearance there.
Hmm. I use regen AND a disc brake. I find that my regen braking just does not cut it in case of an emergency brake. In such a case, I want both my front and rear hydraulic calipers to be fully engaged in providing the maximum braking without blocking.

Users browsing this forum: Arlo1 and 2 guests