
SamTexas wrote:You're welcome. If you do decide to proceed with the capacitor experiment, do come back for a detailed report. I would like to know how it works out.

spuzzete wrote:SamTexas wrote:You're welcome. If you do decide to proceed with the capacitor experiment, do come back for a detailed report. I would like to know how it works out.
I just ordered 2 cell-log 8s so I can produce decent data for the tests I am about to set. I am also tempted to order some of those 1F 5.5v capacitors and try to connect them to each 3,6v "block".
Let's see if it's a total bust or not!

megacycle wrote:spuzzete wrote:SamTexas wrote:You're welcome. If you do decide to proceed with the capacitor experiment, do come back for a detailed report. I would like to know how it works out.
I just ordered 2 cell-log 8s so I can produce decent data for the tests I am about to set. I am also tempted to order some of those 1F 5.5v capacitors and try to connect them to each 3,6v "block".
Let's see if it's a total bust or not!



etriker wrote:If you are using a 10s laptop cell pack then you can parallel a 11s A123 26650 pack and they will act like caps and keep the current draw lower on the laptop cell pack.
I am using 10s 4p 2600mah laptop cell pack in parallel with a 11 s 3p A123 26650 pack to keep the current draw low on the laptop cell pack.
Allows use of a smaller number of laptop cells.
Going up hills the A123's deliver the amps and down hill the laptop cells recharge the A123 cells.
About 14 ah total. 73 cells total.
A friend is using a 10s 4 p laptop cell pack in parallel with a 11 s 1p A123 pack and also gets good results.
His is an ebike and uses less peak amps than my etrike.


etriker wrote:They are in parallel so the voltages on each pack are the same when sitting with no current draw on the packs.
With a load both packs will sag depending on the load.
The A123's will sag less than the laptop cell pack and deliver more current as the load increases.
Real world ebiking is up and down hills and stop and go for most of us.
The max load on my laptop cell pack does not go very high because the A123 packs hold the voltage up and the laptop cells cannot sag.
The less you sag the laptop cell pack the less you overload it.


megacycle wrote:Looking forward to that if you do, though do'nt use those 1F 5.5's, they'll be back up type, they wont work at all.
You need the pulse power low/ultra low esr variety. I'm about to purchase mine thru Maxwell's site.
Tectate's on the site are the same price right up to 10F @ 2.7v @ $2,so x2, 5F @ 5.5v $4 x 10 =$40 + shipping.
There's also be the time constant thing, i'm trying to get my head around as my set up is to be multi tier
how much power to deliver into what impedance, for what durationBack emf oh no headache again
Fetchter's and co. have been doing some nice mod's on the cell logs @ http://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewto ... 14&t=20142, i'm using them and done the jumper mod, not sucking so much now on the 1&2 channels.
Good Luck with it.

etriker wrote:
That is with no load.
10 x 3.7v is 37 volts.
11 x 3.3 is 36.3 volts.



megacycle wrote:These are the one's was hoping to use, 2 in series should give the time constant i need, though how does this relate toscratching my head again
![]()
.
http://www.tecategroup.com/store/index. ... ucts_id=95

ProDigit wrote:Well, just try it out if you don't believe me. Capacitors should be placed in parallel:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=solder+capacitors+ ... +or+series
http://www.electronics2000.co.uk/calc/s ... ulator.php
Capacitor calculator shows a DECREASE in capacity when soldering in series; they will function,but just less good than when you'd just take the most powerful capacitor and connect it by itself.

spuzzete wrote:Will it be better or worse if I will connect a 1F 5.5v cap ( http://www.ebay.ca/itm/1F-1-Farad-10000 ... 27c21b24d5#ht_1628wt_952) to each one of the 3.6v cells?
Using supercapacitors and having to balance them separately sounds like a pain.

liveforphysics wrote:Also, this is kinda funny, but good RC LiPo can output higher power per volume and per weight than super caps.



liveforphysics wrote:
Also, this is kinda funny, but good RC LiPo can output higher power per volume and per weight than super caps.

CamLight wrote:Using a 5.5V cap connected across each cell is a great idea. Unfortunately, that cap you mentioned will only supply milliamps (if that) at a time. You need a cap that supplies 10's of amps, with a very low ESR (resistance) value to prevent large voltage drops inside the cap. This low ESR requires LOTs of room to achieve and leads to very large supercaps. There's just no way to do it with small caps.
There are some 5.5V caps with moderate ESR that might be able to help your cells a bit. Not as much as another cell or the very-low ESR cap types (typically 2.5V or 2.7V-rated), but perhaps just enough. Or, you could wire two 2.7V low-ESR caps in series across each cell and just take your chances in regard to balancing. With only two caps in series there's a lower chance of them going out of balance.


etriker wrote:
The A123 cells I am using are from 2006 recovered from bad Dewalt packs.
6 years old and still going !
Overcharge them, overdischarge them, for being li cells they are hard to kill.
Laptop cell packs make good extender packs for long rides. My laptop cells are also from 2006 recovered from bad hp battery packs.


Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Trilska and 9 guests