Search found 9466 matches

by Hillhater
Jun 25 2019 6:52pm
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

Bill, so you are denying there has been a “pause” in temperature increase since the turn of the millenium ..or there abouts.
And you believe the IPCC forecasts predicted that period ?
by Hillhater
Jun 25 2019 6:48pm
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

34° degrees Celsius here in Wales uk on Friday that's exceptional heat, unless your a meteorologist and take measurements yourself shut the fuk up your boring everyone. Intelligent contribution ?? “34 deg, ..Exceptional heat” ...is it? Over 40 years ago, in the south of England , we had multiple co...
by Hillhater
Jun 25 2019 6:38pm
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

lol, 20 year old paper. It's been proven incorrect. I can understand why you wont accept any contrary evidence,.. But since when did the date of the research invalidate the science ? And unless you can provide a specific reference for that “proven incorrect” comment,.. i will take it you just pulle...
by Hillhater
Jun 25 2019 8:48am
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

Nope. The take air sample from the ice 50, 100,200, 100o years ago and measure the CO2. It's direct. . It only a measurement of the CO2 in the air in the ice Its not a direct atmospheric sample......Apples to rotten fruit ! Remember , other analytical assesments of historic CO2 levels DO NOT agree ...
by Hillhater
Jun 25 2019 8:39am
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

But even still, let's not get mired in minutia. Let's chek the fundamentals: CO2 increasing rapidly in the atmosphere over the last 30 years? Check. Mankind pumping billions of tonnes of fossil CO2 into the atmosphere every year? Check. Global temperatures increasing rapidly over the last 30 years?...
by Hillhater
Jun 25 2019 8:30am
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

I actually tried to find the source of this "only 16 ppm of CO2 in the atmosphere is fossil by isotope analysis" and couldn't find anything on google despite playing with a few keywords. :... You need to brush up on your Google skills.. And go beyond those same old biased and ill researched sites t...
by Hillhater
Jun 25 2019 8:10am
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

Nope. Totally wrong. THEY MEASURE AIR, not a proxy. They are measuring the level of CO2 remaining in a “X” thousand year old ice sample and ASSUMING that it is representative of the actual CO2 level in the atmosphere at that time. It is not a direct measurement of an atmospheric sample. IT IS A PRO...
by Hillhater
Jun 25 2019 7:19am
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

From your link.. ..... Many researchers believe the steady rise in sunspots and faculae since the late seventeenth century may be responsible for as much as half of the 0.6 degrees of global warming over the last 110 years (IPCC, 2001). Since pre-industrial times, it’s thought that the Sun has given...
by Hillhater
Jun 25 2019 5:50am
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

Most likely source is. ( as you know). The Sun.
by Hillhater
Jun 25 2019 4:41am
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

Right, so despite your misgivings about how the temperature records were collected, the fact that no glacier on the face of the earth has grown, and places that were once solid ice are now liquid water, would you agree that there must have been some additional heat added to the system? sure ! More ...
by Hillhater
Jun 25 2019 2:59am
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

Hillhater, do you accept that the Earth's surface (oceans and atmosphere) is getting hotter? And by hotter, I mean hotter compared to both a short term average (last 100 years) and a longer term average (last 5000 years) I could agree that the temperature may be increasing, and the climate changing...
by Hillhater
Jun 24 2019 11:39pm
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

...There is no evidence that the natural variation, which was steady for 1000's of years prior to humans burning fossil fuels, magically began to increase at the exact same time. We can measure the increase in temperature due to CO2, This has been experimentally verified. Spectroscopy confirms ther...
by Hillhater
Jun 24 2019 9:12pm
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

The polling comment was a simple analogy to show how mass opinion does not necessarily reflect the true situation. And, they do claim that the polls are scientifically researched (statistical data analysis ?) But it does not matter, if you cannot see the parallels . :roll: You could save us all a bu...
by Hillhater
Jun 24 2019 6:21pm
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Mercedes new ISG system, with 48V lithium battery
Replies: 5
Views: 106

Re: Mercedes new ISG system, with 48V lithium battery

The latest variation of the many “48v Mild Hybrid” systems anounced several years ago
viewtopic.php?t=89429
I believe Audi/VW have some on the market
by Hillhater
Jun 24 2019 5:50pm
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

Sea level will rise 3' way before 2100. It has been understated. but I have no proof yet but it's coming. Now, what do you base that statement on ? Your own research ? Some other prediction ?...IPCC perhaps ? Any scientific basis ? Or do you just believe it because it has been said in the media so ...
by Hillhater
Jun 24 2019 3:23pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: '67 VW Beetle does wheelies but driver gets 49 days in jail!
Replies: 4
Views: 184

Re: '67 VW Beetle does wheelies but driver gets 49 days in jail!

You don’t encourage or admire that kind of dumb jerk hooning in public places.. It can get innocent folk killed. Just this week a schoolgirl was killed (another critical) when a Tool lost control of his Lamborghini whilst hooning, and ran onto a sidewalk https://www.google.com.au/amp/amp.abc.net.au/...
by Hillhater
Jun 24 2019 3:06pm
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

No, it's the 100 000 papers that all come to the same conclusion that constitute proof.. It's the deniers that think 1 or 2 outliers mean anything. Unless those conclusions are Based on, and backed up with, scientific data.....they do not constitute proof. ....no matter how many there are. lol, so ...
by Hillhater
Jun 24 2019 1:25am
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

Looks like catastrophic is still the best way to describe it :( About a billion people live between 0 and 2 m above sea level. IF they can flee to higher ground they will occupy land once used for something other than housing or latrines, like food production or nature conservation. Expect to see a...
by Hillhater
Jun 24 2019 12:58am
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

You do realise that “consensus” of opinion is not scientific proof ? No, it's the 100 000 papers that all come to the same conclusion that constitute proof.. It's the deniers that think 1 or 2 outliers mean anything. Unless those conclusions are Based on, and backed up with, scientific data.....the...
by Hillhater
Jun 23 2019 6:50pm
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

But OK then, show the “peer reviewed” scientific proof of CO2 increase being due to human input.? And CO2 levels driving climate change . ? "During 2013 and 2014, only 4 of 69,406 authors of peer-reviewed articles on global warming, 0.0058% or 1 in 17,352, rejected AGW. Thus, the consensus on AGW a...
by Hillhater
Jun 22 2019 8:11pm
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

I forgat to ask.. Can you provide a link to a list of these, or even a reference .. ....a signed affidavit by almost every single climate scientist on the planet. How many papers and reports on the increase in CO2 due to human activity ie. fossil fuels, would it take to change your mind? .... Just o...
by Hillhater
Jun 22 2019 7:58pm
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

So which prediction are you referring to here ? Certainly none of the IPCC ones Or have you just imagined another one ? Simple energy balance models developed in the 70's, which represent the majority of the forcing, .. If that is what you are refering to, be more specific with a reference.
by Hillhater
Jun 22 2019 7:54pm
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

.... the evidence for AGW is peer reviewed science, ... . Ahhh.. :roll: back to square one again ! :roll: .. But OK then, show the “peer reviewed” scientific proof of CO2 increase being due to human input.? And CO2 levels driving climate change . ? Specifically what about temperature increases and ...
by Hillhater
Jun 22 2019 7:43pm
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

Four studies confirm it... I guess you dont read, dont check, or just dont want to accept.. All four of those studies you cited have been debunked many times By deniers. The sort of deniers that claim "the climate isn't warming! And if it is, we have NOTHING to do with it! Actually several of those...
by Hillhater
Jun 22 2019 7:12pm
Forum: E-Vehicles General Discussion
Topic: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear
Replies: 4367
Views: 160108

Re: Wind and Solar vs Coal, Gasoline, Nuclear

So scientists, INVITED by journalists. .. , are you suggesting they were forced to comment , maybe say things they didnt want to say ? ..the 2 degree rise in temperature expected with doubling CO2 ppm made in the 70's based on simple energy balances is pretty much spot on. Even the models are prett...