john61ct said:
IMO for critical use cases go with fuses.
When I said about space being limited, what I actually meant (and should have said) was access space. It's a HELL of a lot easier to reach a breaker and flip it with your arm wedged between a drawer runner and a 2x4 than it is to unscrew a cover, pull out a blown fuse, and fit a replacement :lol:
I agree though; fuses would be better, but it's always going to be one compromise or the other, and in this case, I don't really mind expense (as long as it's not utterly extortionate, like the £12,000 ones I found haha!).
dustNbone said:
Also keep in mind that most breakers are not rated for switching duty. If you're using them as switches and they're not rated as such you will wear out the latching mechanisms quite quickly and they will not hold their rated current anymore.
To be honest, I thought this was why the first one failed as I'd been using it to isolate and re-isolate a circuit during testing. Then two of them failed when they hadn't been latched/unlatched ever... Proper Chinese quality
I'm not looking for switching duty though, just to avoid the need to replace fuses if there's a problem.
danielrlee said:
I am the vendor of the breaker linked to. Also available with 10% off if purchased direct using the discount code 'ENDLESS10':
https://torquetech.co.uk/collections/miniature-circuit-breakers-mcbs
Thanks for jumping in here with that, super helpful
Couple of questions before I order, if I may...
1) How do you wire into these? Is it a screw clamp or something different? And what wire size can they take?
2) You mention using them in parallel to up the rating - I've seen them used that way in marine environments - are you able to provide any distribution block-type things to connect them in parallel reliably? I don't have much fabrication equipment.
Cheers all!