Batteries, Chargers, and Battery Management Systems.
-
Chalo 100 GW

- Posts: 10420
- Joined: Apr 29 2009 11:29pm
- Location: Austin, Texas
Post
by Chalo » Sep 23 2021 11:05am
speedmd wrote: ↑Sep 23 2021 9:40am
If the life cycle and capacity end up coming close to claims, you could see relatively large cap packs fitting inside conventional size bike tubes soon.
Great. What could possibly go wrong?
I've worked on enough Van Moofs that I won't work on Van Moofs anymore. The designers ruined that bike by pandering to people's infantile obsession with hiding the working parts of a machine.
This is to express my gratitude to Justin of Grin Technologies for his extraordinary measures to save this forum for the benefit of all.
-
JackFlorey 100 kW

- Posts: 1313
- Joined: Feb 19 2020 7:22pm
Post
by JackFlorey » Sep 23 2021 11:20am
Hillhater wrote: ↑Sep 21 2021 7:03pm
Another player in the LiSulphur market claiming 3x the energy density of NMC, thermal control, low cost, yada yada yada...
Oxis tried that. I tested some of their cells, and they met their specs at first even though the specs weren't very good. A month later they were dead. They went bankrupt.
-
ZeroEm 10 MW

- Posts: 2335
- Joined: May 03 2019 11:53am
- Location: San Antonio, TX
Post
by ZeroEm » Oct 02 2021 6:41am
That is what some are trying todo here. compression fit. Wonder what materials they are using to maintain compression. I see the bolts but it's the pads would like to know more about.
Have not started building batteries as yet. Don't think applying heat if best for long life batteries. Sure it's great for a year or two.
That and the ability to service them would be a bit less dramatic.
by aroundqube » Oct 01 2021 7:40pm
I did not find this in search, so here goes ; Aceleron non welded battery using compression technology
https://www.aceleronenergy.com/
-
aroundqube 10 kW

- Posts: 542
- Joined: Mar 12 2012 9:58pm
Post
by aroundqube » Oct 02 2021 6:25pm
Aceleron patent info with patent images download
https://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2020/0227697.html Regarding PR releases , a reporter wrote about the large number of vehicle batteries to become worn out and the negative effect of recycling cells that are welded together . Aceleron is saying that when their design is no longer able to power a vehicle , the cells can be moved to a storage unit for solar use, etc.
-
fechter 100 GW

- Posts: 15763
- Joined: Dec 31 2006 3:23pm
- Location: California Bay Area, USA
Post
by fechter » Oct 03 2021 11:01am
I think some of the weld-free packs done on the forum here look better than theirs. I'm still not convinced that weld-free compression packs will hold up long term. There will either be corrosion on the contacts or the ends of the cells will get dented. But I see some that have been working for a while so it may be possible.

- aceleron battery.JPG (70.91 KiB) Viewed 1359 times
"One test is worth a thousand opinions"
-
ZeroEm 10 MW

- Posts: 2335
- Joined: May 03 2019 11:53am
- Location: San Antonio, TX
Post
by ZeroEm » Oct 04 2021 11:48am
Yes, just let me know when they are ready.

My mind is having issues after reading what Luke has to say about welding to Can cells. Seems no matter how good it's done the battery ends up with some level of damage. I know it may not be that much. But it bothers me. If the weld free don't seem ready in the next few years then think of switching container type.
by fechter » Oct 03 2021 11:01am
I think some of the weld-free packs done on the forum here look better than theirs. I'm still not convinced that weld-free compression packs will hold up long term. There will either be corrosion on the contacts or the ends of the cells will get dented. But I see some that have been working for a while so it may be possible.
-
Hillhater 100 GW

- Posts: 12273
- Joined: Aug 03 2010 10:33pm
- Location: Sydney ..(Hilly part !) .. Australia/ Down under !
Post
by Hillhater » Oct 06 2021 6:26pm
Interesting, but....they dont explain exactly what the big improvement in track performance was due to.
The pack size & weight is unchanged (20-25 kg) and the max power drain is limited to 120 kW still.
Unless Honda’s old (2015 !) pack design was way under power , i suspect that most teams can build a 25 kg , (5 kWh ?), lipo pack with 120 kW output capacity.
But its noticeable that the regulations do not limit the capacity of the pack, only its weight, and do not limit the discharge energy, only the discharge power !
So, maybe Honda’s new pack has better energy density and can hold more KWhs and hence supply 120 kw for longer ?
Especially as there is no limit on the power delivered from the battery to the turbo ?
Yes, energy density increase seems to be the answer !
But i am surprised it has taken then since 2015 to improve that !
This forum owes its existence to Justin of ebikes.ca
-
Ianhill 100 MW

- Posts: 2724
- Joined: Sep 25 2015 5:55pm
Post
by Ianhill » Oct 06 2021 7:56pm
Theres 4500mah lipo from 2014 that have 45c discharge 25kg worth would be 4.2kwh and 180kw peaks available then theres a newer 5000mah cells that kick that figure well into touch then theres the newest lipo ive seen is a 2020 cell thats 5500mah 120c 110g a cell a pack configured with them in theory could deliver half a megawatt for 25kg lol.
Theres enough potential there to dump that into a massive coil and set off an emp pulse that would be quite powerful indeed.
Infinite hrspwrs.
-
Hillhater 100 GW

- Posts: 12273
- Joined: Aug 03 2010 10:33pm
- Location: Sydney ..(Hilly part !) .. Australia/ Down under !
Post
by Hillhater » Oct 06 2021 9:48pm
Yes, as i said, that level of discharge power ..25+C has been available for many years in Lipo ( and LIfpo4)..
....but you have to consider discharge duration also. More energy density means longer discharge power periods....useful in racing.
Also with current regulations, pack cycle life is important to avoid component replacement penalties.
This forum owes its existence to Justin of ebikes.ca
-
speedmd 1 GW

- Posts: 3178
- Joined: Nov 14 2012 12:16pm
- Location: new england
Post
by speedmd » Oct 06 2021 10:00pm
The pack size & weight is unchanged (20-25 kg) and the max power drain is limited to 120 kW still
Most likely it is not much lighter but has a bit more capacity. Thermal management (current rollback) is a big issue in this app so the claimed lower resistance of the new cells most likely adds a significant amount to the duty cycle.
From what I can gather, Power is limited only on the K (Drive) side directly to-from the battery . Unlimited on the H (turbo) side. Both ways!. Cells that can suck up power and dump it more efficiently will effectively be able to supercharge the piston engine harder for longer periods through the H side and or use the turbo generated electric direct to the K side without going through the battery and suffer its power limits. Driver has some options on the bias.
Max was running away from Hamilton at spa. It is a significant upgrade in this app.
-
Hillhater 100 GW

- Posts: 12273
- Joined: Aug 03 2010 10:33pm
- Location: Sydney ..(Hilly part !) .. Australia/ Down under !
Post
by Hillhater » Oct 10 2021 8:14pm
More on Lithium Sulphur ..and another player. “Lyten” who have been working in the background apparently on their “Military” developments ., 900Wh/kg ....”Lytcel” !
The “sweetened” LiSulphur cell is now proposed as a practical 500 Wh/kg , 1000cycle cell within 5 years
https://youtu.be/mqH5yB9RB_Y
This forum owes its existence to Justin of ebikes.ca
-
speedmd 1 GW

- Posts: 3178
- Joined: Nov 14 2012 12:16pm
- Location: new england
Post
by speedmd » Oct 13 2021 9:02pm
Many are selling 2022 auto models now and claim is the 2025-26 models will have access to the Lyten lithium sulfur cells. Looks like capacity (Need faster 3D graphene process?) is being promised out to the aviation players at the moment on a prototype basis.
https://aviationweek.com/aerospace/urba ... ium-sulfur

Last edited by
speedmd on Oct 14 2021 10:09am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Hillhater 100 GW

- Posts: 12273
- Joined: Aug 03 2010 10:33pm
- Location: Sydney ..(Hilly part !) .. Australia/ Down under !
Post
by Hillhater » Oct 14 2021 12:17am
Paywalled !
Anything revealing inside that article ?
This forum owes its existence to Justin of ebikes.ca
-
speedmd 1 GW

- Posts: 3178
- Joined: Nov 14 2012 12:16pm
- Location: new england
Post
by speedmd » Oct 14 2021 7:33am
Hillhater wrote: ↑Oct 14 2021 12:17am
Paywalled !
Anything revealing inside that article ?
I had the same question. Way too cheap to pay to read it however

Most likely the brief exposed bits say what needs to be understood, that the stuff is way too expensive for cheap EV manufacturers and they are focusing on markets with deeper pockets.
https://aviationweek.com/aerospace/urba ... ium-sulfur
-
Hillhater 100 GW

- Posts: 12273
- Joined: Aug 03 2010 10:33pm
- Location: Sydney ..(Hilly part !) .. Australia/ Down under !
Post
by Hillhater » Oct 23 2021 6:54pm
TSA..???
WTF has this got to do with battery breakthroughs !
Are you managing your med’s today ?

This forum owes its existence to Justin of ebikes.ca
-
Ianhill 100 MW

- Posts: 2724
- Joined: Sep 25 2015 5:55pm
Post
by Ianhill » Oct 23 2021 10:06pm
I'm not sure whos most mad anymore is it me licking the window on the inside or the outsiders trying to lick they way in, one things for sure the glass is mighty clean.
Infinite hrspwrs.
-
speedmd 1 GW

- Posts: 3178
- Joined: Nov 14 2012 12:16pm
- Location: new england
Post
by speedmd » Oct 25 2021 7:53am
Sure wish he would start sharing that new high potency medical crop for times following crashing bad in the rock garden.

-
Hillhater 100 GW

- Posts: 12273
- Joined: Aug 03 2010 10:33pm
- Location: Sydney ..(Hilly part !) .. Australia/ Down under !
Post
by Hillhater » Nov 09 2021 8:02pm
Factorial Solid State Batteries for Hyundai and Kia EVs .
Another player in the Lithium SS cell tech has linked up with Hyundai for new pack developments.
USA based Factorial claim to have a commercial SS cell that will give 20-50% more range (energy density ?) than current Li cells
https://factorialenergy.com/
This forum owes its existence to Justin of ebikes.ca
-
spinningmagnets 100 GW

- Posts: 12711
- Joined: Dec 21 2007 10:27pm
- Location: Ft Riley, NE Kansas
Post
by spinningmagnets » Nov 09 2021 8:07pm
I'll have to find a good link, but...SODIUM-based batteries are getting a LOT of funding right now. Not for vehicles, but for stationary applications. It's the push for reducing or eliminating nickel and cobalt from batteries.
Nickel and cobalt have been proven to be recycle-able from packs that get old, so that is a huge relief.
-
ZeroEm 10 MW

- Posts: 2335
- Joined: May 03 2019 11:53am
- Location: San Antonio, TX
Post
by ZeroEm » Nov 11 2021 10:09am
-
TheBeastie 10 MW

- Posts: 2085
- Joined: Jul 28 2012 12:31am
- Location: Melbourne Australia
Post
by TheBeastie » Dec 04 2021 5:45am
YouTube recommended me this video which came out a few weeks ago, has some interesting things I didn't know, for example I thought we never see LFP because they must be kind of crappy but it turns out the real reason is they are patented so they can't be legally sold outside of China.
The video is also full of quite remarkable juicy claims, like this one at 14:42 where this guy says their up coming lithium cells exceed 500Wh/kg
https://youtu.be/DFL8iQ3p3cI?t=892
-
Pajda 1 kW

- Posts: 473
- Joined: Jan 24 2016 3:45am
- Location: Czech Republic
Post
by Pajda » Dec 04 2021 6:43am
The main problem with LFP chemistry until recently was really crappy parameters, particularly energy density. For portable electronics are useless even today, but for electric vehicles you need only at least 400 Wh/l and 180 Wh/kg at the cell level (this allows for 200 miles EPA/WLTP range which is an imaginary lower limit for sustainability. EVs with lower range will soon disappear. Btw. this was already known in 2012). Industrial LFP cells with these parameters have appeared on the market in ca 2019. That simple it is.