john61ct said:Suggestions for other high power controllers,
anything above what a Phaserunner handles
would also be appreciated.
Sevcon, ASI BAC, Kelly and Sabvoton are the ones I've come across, but have not seen any consensus as to build quality or ease of configuration.
As I stated, eBike noob here looking for specific suggestions to help further my research.E-HP said:Do you have other criteria (e.g. both the VESC based controllers and Phaserunner are pretty compact), like FOC, variable regen, field weakening, etc., or just high current).
I have no reason to go over 52V nominal, likely less is fine.district9prawn said:I feel the vesc controllers don't make sense for DD hubs due to the lower voltage limit.
But the TI boards are also running FOC. Some more info:Foc is slower than in bldc mode with square waves and that’s normal but never been a problem for me but u can chose the bldc mode as well
ProgramThyself said:But the TI boards are also running FOC. Some more info:Foc is slower than in bldc mode with square waves and that’s normal but never been a problem for me but u can chose the bldc mode as well
14 V - VESC Isupply = 0.51 A, TI Isupply = 0.63 A
32 V - VESC Isupply = 0.75 A, TI Isupply = 0.89 A
Interesting. My uneducated assumption is that the higher speed program, TI boards or something, has a higher kv essentially and lower kt, so lower km, and the motor is less efficient when run with the TI program. I know nothing bout programs but that's an assumption based on basic motor performance characteristics. Is that unrelated? Probably in the thread linked but impatientProgramThyself said:But the TI boards are also running FOC. Some more info:Foc is slower than in bldc mode with square waves and that’s normal but never been a problem for me but u can chose the bldc mode as well
14 V - VESC Isupply = 0.51 A, TI Isupply = 0.63 A
32 V - VESC Isupply = 0.75 A, TI Isupply = 0.89 A
I've been trying a VESC 6 on a test stand. My first impression is that it is slower than TI eval boards that are running code based on TI's InstaSPIN examples. Unloaded wheel RPM's are reduced by 15 %.