jesusxd00 said:
Thoughts on this? If you mean about the thread, here are some general thoughts based on observing forum requests and responses.
The quality of advice provided on this forum is commensurate with the quality of information provided up front by the poster. Some people read the stickies on how to get advice (what info to provide, etc.) and some obviously don't. Threads that don't make it, usually provide very little information up front. The typical pattern then is that someone tries to help using that minimal information, and then the poster will add a little more information, that invalidates the advice. That can cycle through several iterations.
As far as responders go, some will read the original post, see that it lacks info, ignore and move on. Some are willing to go through the question and answer routine to eventually get the information to provide proper advice. Some will just wait, check back once in a while, until there is sufficient information before providing the advice, rather than providing advice based on limited details and being told the hamburger is bad (https://endless-sphere.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=94719&p=1387416&hilit=hamburger+bad#p1387416)
I think at this point on this thread, most people are falling into the third category, or just don't want to read through the whole thread to get the information that would have been helpful, if it were provided up front.
If you're really only using it to test the motor, then any cheap dual mode (sensored or sensorless) will work to see if the halls function, and if not, if the motor functions. But since you already bought the unit (I see this all the time too, where posters ask if something will work, and find out later they already ordered it), it should be fine for testing.
