burst or continuous? it'll last a few minutes continuous.brucejun said:Hi everyone,
I have a MAC 8T hub motor paired with ASI BAC 800 controller and 52v battery w/ 40A BMS. It is currently set for 1500w max. Would it be safe to run this around 2000W or a little beyond? TIA.
E-HP said:burst or continuous? it'll last a few minutes continuous.brucejun said:Hi everyone,
I have a MAC 8T hub motor paired with ASI BAC 800 controller and 52v battery w/ 40A BMS. It is currently set for 1500w max. Would it be safe to run this around 2000W or a little beyond? TIA.
brucejun said:E-HP said:burst or continuous? it'll last a few minutes continuous.brucejun said:Hi everyone,
I have a MAC 8T hub motor paired with ASI BAC 800 controller and 52v battery w/ 40A BMS. It is currently set for 1500w max. Would it be safe to run this around 2000W or a little beyond? TIA.
Burst for up to 5 mins.
E-HP said:brucejun said:E-HP said:burst or continuous? it'll last a few minutes continuous.brucejun said:Hi everyone,
I have a MAC 8T hub motor paired with ASI BAC 800 controller and 52v battery w/ 40A BMS. It is currently set for 1500w max. Would it be safe to run this around 2000W or a little beyond? TIA.
Burst for up to 5 mins.
Looks like 3 minutes to meltdown at 2000W
https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.html?motor=MMAC8T&batt=B5216_GA&cont=cust_60_150_0.03_V&hp=0&grade=20&axis=mph
E-HP said:brucejun said:E-HP said:burst or continuous? it'll last a few minutes continuous.brucejun said:Hi everyone,
I have a MAC 8T hub motor paired with ASI BAC 800 controller and 52v battery w/ 40A BMS. It is currently set for 1500w max. Would it be safe to run this around 2000W or a little beyond? TIA.
Burst for up to 5 mins.
Looks like 3 minutes to meltdown at 2000W
https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.html?motor=MMAC8T&batt=B5216_GA&cont=cust_60_150_0.03_V&hp=0&grade=20&axis=mph
That's how you get the simulator to reproduce that load level.TuomasK said:E-HP said:brucejun said:E-HP said:burst or continuous? it'll last a few minutes continuous.
Burst for up to 5 mins.
Looks like 3 minutes to meltdown at 2000W
https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.html?motor=MMAC8T&batt=B5216_GA&cont=cust_60_150_0.03_V&hp=0&grade=20&axis=mph
Yes. Full throttle on 20% grade (crazy!!) uphill.
Since the motor won't get close to pulling 2000W on flat ground (only 1100W), the only other parameter that the simulator has available is to apply headwind, but even with a 30mph headwind, that only gets the motor up to 1600W.neptronix said:Uphill is the worst scenario for any hub motor, because low RPM correlates with low efficiency. Continuous power handling needs to be assessed on flat ground for a neutral comparison. On the simulator, increase the voltage to do this.
E-HP said:That's how you get the simulator to reproduce that load level.TuomasK said:E-HP said:brucejun said:Burst for up to 5 mins.
Looks like 3 minutes to meltdown at 2000W
https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.html?motor=MMAC8T&batt=B5216_GA&cont=cust_60_150_0.03_V&hp=0&grade=20&axis=mph
Yes. Full throttle on 20% grade (crazy!!) uphill.
TuomasK said:E-HP said:That's how you get the simulator to reproduce that load level.TuomasK said:E-HP said:Looks like 3 minutes to meltdown at 2000W
https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.html?motor=MMAC8T&batt=B5216_GA&cont=cust_60_150_0.03_V&hp=0&grade=20&axis=mph
Yes. Full throttle on 20% grade (crazy!!) uphill.
Thats wrong way to do it.
E-HP said:TuomasK said:E-HP said:That's how you get the simulator to reproduce that load level.TuomasK said:Yes. Full throttle on 20% grade (crazy!!) uphill.
Thats wrong way to do it.
elaborate.
TuomasK said:E-HP said:TuomasK said:E-HP said:That's how you get the simulator to reproduce that load level.
Thats wrong way to do it.
elaborate.
Increase loading by slowing motor rpm affects the efficiency and increases phase amps that makes the motor heat up faster. Also decreasing speed affects the cooling negatively. Of course increasing loading desrcibes that specific situation correctly.
Now when we are talking about ASi 800 we should consider also field weakening that is not incorporated within the motor simulator at least yet. That will extend the power-speed curve starting from the excisting max power value towards higher rpms. This will drop the efficiency a bit though.
But lets consider this case without field weakening feature. The question itself is broad and giving on answer might be misleading in context of real life settings but giving couple of examples might enlighten this so.
First level ground full 52v battery 40A (100A phase) controller and 26" wheel is max 2070w configuration. Motor can withstand this maximum of 12 minutes at 373 rpm (29.1 mph).
https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.html?motor=MMAC8T&batt=cust_58_0.15_18&cont=cust_40_100_0.03_V&hp=0&grade=0&axis=mph&wheel=26i
When we load the motor in any way to decrease rpm but still pulling 2000w the time for overheating decreases. At minimum rpm where 2000w draw can happen is 118 rpm (9.2 mph). Motor will overheat in 2.3 minutes.
https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.html?motor=MMAC8T&batt=cust_58_0.15_18&cont=cust_40_100_0.03_V&hp=0&grade=0&axis=mph&wheel=26i
Also we can look this the other way round. You can pull 1700w forever and never overheat the motor if your rpm is >408 (31.8 mph).
https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.html?motor=MMAC8T&batt=cust_58_0.15_18&cont=cust_40_100_0.03_V&hp=0&grade=0&axis=mph&wheel=26i
Then at low rpms where the phase amps (and so torque) are maxed you will overheat the motor quite instantly with 100A phase current.
https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.html?motor=MMAC8T&batt=cust_58_0.15_18&cont=cust_40_100_0.03_V&hp=0&grade=0&axis=mph&wheel=26i&throt=100
Considering safe phase amps that will not overheat the motor in any imaginable slow speed settings will require us to go as low as 30A. In real world we dont want to limit our phase amps to 30 but ride wisely and possibly monitor motor temp.
https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.html?motor=MMAC8T&batt=cust_58_0.15_18&cont=cust_30_30_0.03_V&hp=0&grade=0&axis=mph&wheel=26i&throt=100
Checked those they match but you need to move the cursor on the graph according to my narrative. Links do not support cursor position.E-HP said:TuomasK said:E-HP said:TuomasK said:Thats wrong way to do it.
elaborate.
Increase loading by slowing motor rpm affects the efficiency and increases phase amps that makes the motor heat up faster. Also decreasing speed affects the cooling negatively. Of course increasing loading desrcibes that specific situation correctly.
Now when we are talking about ASi 800 we should consider also field weakening that is not incorporated within the motor simulator at least yet. That will extend the power-speed curve starting from the excisting max power value towards higher rpms. This will drop the efficiency a bit though.
But lets consider this case without field weakening feature. The question itself is broad and giving on answer might be misleading in context of real life settings but giving couple of examples might enlighten this so.
First level ground full 52v battery 40A (100A phase) controller and 26" wheel is max 2070w configuration. Motor can withstand this maximum of 12 minutes at 373 rpm (29.1 mph).
https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.html?motor=MMAC8T&batt=cust_58_0.15_18&cont=cust_40_100_0.03_V&hp=0&grade=0&axis=mph&wheel=26i
When we load the motor in any way to decrease rpm but still pulling 2000w the time for overheating decreases. At minimum rpm where 2000w draw can happen is 118 rpm (9.2 mph). Motor will overheat in 2.3 minutes.
https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.html?motor=MMAC8T&batt=cust_58_0.15_18&cont=cust_40_100_0.03_V&hp=0&grade=0&axis=mph&wheel=26i
Also we can look this the other way round. You can pull 1700w forever and never overheat the motor if your rpm is >408 (31.8 mph).
https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.html?motor=MMAC8T&batt=cust_58_0.15_18&cont=cust_40_100_0.03_V&hp=0&grade=0&axis=mph&wheel=26i
Then at low rpms where the phase amps (and so torque) are maxed you will overheat the motor quite instantly with 100A phase current.
https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.html?motor=MMAC8T&batt=cust_58_0.15_18&cont=cust_40_100_0.03_V&hp=0&grade=0&axis=mph&wheel=26i&throt=100
Considering safe phase amps that will not overheat the motor in any imaginable slow speed settings will require us to go as low as 30A. In real world we dont want to limit our phase amps to 30 but ride wisely and possibly monitor motor temp.
https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.html?motor=MMAC8T&batt=cust_58_0.15_18&cont=cust_30_30_0.03_V&hp=0&grade=0&axis=mph&wheel=26i&throt=100
your links don't match your narrative.
E-HP said:Since the motor won't get close to pulling 2000W on flat ground (only 1100W), the only other parameter that the simulator has available is to apply headwind, but even with a 30mph headwind, that only gets the motor up to 1600W.neptronix said:Uphill is the worst scenario for any hub motor, because low RPM correlates with low efficiency. Continuous power handling needs to be assessed on flat ground for a neutral comparison. On the simulator, increase the voltage to do this.
https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.html?motor=MMAC8T&batt=B5216_GA&cont=cust_60_150_0.03_V&hp=0&grade=0&axis=mph&wind=0&cont_b=cust_60_150_0.03_V&motor_b=MMAC8T&batt_b=B5216_GA&hp_b=0&bopen=true&wind_b=-30
But if you did have a headwind that creates 2000W of load, then I believe the same issues would be encountered as if the load was from climbing, to the motor at least (other than trying not to be blown over by a 50mph headwind, and the additional air cooling for the motor).
1942W actually, since the question is if the motor can handle 2000W, not how much is being pulled from the battery at any given time. I'm not sure I buy into moving the slider as being the "right" way to simulate 2000W of continuous load, since the slider shows the outputs at that speed(assuming the throttle box isn't checked) for accelerating at full throttle, so not continuous. While adding a grade or wind resistance simulates a continuous load, and the motor itself doesn't know it's due to a hill or wind.TuomasK said:E-HP said:Since the motor won't get close to pulling 2000W on flat ground (only 1100W), the only other parameter that the simulator has available is to apply headwind, but even with a 30mph headwind, that only gets the motor up to 1600W.neptronix said:Uphill is the worst scenario for any hub motor, because low RPM correlates with low efficiency. Continuous power handling needs to be assessed on flat ground for a neutral comparison. On the simulator, increase the voltage to do this.
https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.html?motor=MMAC8T&batt=B5216_GA&cont=cust_60_150_0.03_V&hp=0&grade=0&axis=mph&wind=0&cont_b=cust_60_150_0.03_V&motor_b=MMAC8T&batt_b=B5216_GA&hp_b=0&bopen=true&wind_b=-30
But if you did have a headwind that creates 2000W of load, then I believe the same issues would be encountered as if the load was from climbing, to the motor at least (other than trying not to be blown over by a 50mph headwind, and the additional air cooling for the motor).
Your example is 2600w of battery power (controller rating) for both A & B at 260 rpm. Mechanical (rotational power) is ~2000w for both cases.
The question was can the motor handle 2000w. The 2600w in your example IS the power the motor is handling. The 2000w is the power after motor efficiency losses. It takes in 2600w and converts 2000w (1942w) of it into mechanical work.E-HP said:1942W actually, since the question is if the motor can handle 2000W, not how much is being pulled from the battery at any given time. I'm not sure I buy into moving the slider as being the "right" way to simulate 2000W of continuous load, since the slider shows the outputs at that speed(assuming the throttle box isn't checked) for accelerating at full throttle, so not continuous. While adding a grade or wind resistance simulates a continuous load, and the motor itself doesn't know it's due to a hill or wind.TuomasK said:E-HP said:Since the motor won't get close to pulling 2000W on flat ground (only 1100W), the only other parameter that the simulator has available is to apply headwind, but even with a 30mph headwind, that only gets the motor up to 1600W.neptronix said:Uphill is the worst scenario for any hub motor, because low RPM correlates with low efficiency. Continuous power handling needs to be assessed on flat ground for a neutral comparison. On the simulator, increase the voltage to do this.
https://ebikes.ca/tools/simulator.html?motor=MMAC8T&batt=B5216_GA&cont=cust_60_150_0.03_V&hp=0&grade=0&axis=mph&wind=0&cont_b=cust_60_150_0.03_V&motor_b=MMAC8T&batt_b=B5216_GA&hp_b=0&bopen=true&wind_b=-30
But if you did have a headwind that creates 2000W of load, then I believe the same issues would be encountered as if the load was from climbing, to the motor at least (other than trying not to be blown over by a 50mph headwind, and the additional air cooling for the motor).
Your example is 2600w of battery power (controller rating) for both A & B at 260 rpm. Mechanical (rotational power) is ~2000w for both cases.
neptronix said:Flat ground on high voltage will tell you a lot more about continuous power handling.
neptronix said:Perhaps we should wait for OP to reply, ha.
The ASI controller brings the options to do flux weakening and could run 2000w continuous on the lower voltage, just like my oldschool infineon clones. That's how i managed long periods of >2000w on an 8T winding MAC on 15S lipo... at the cost of some efficiency. :thumb: