Sur-Ron - New Mid drive Bike

Rix said:
DMV inspection. I did mine at the DMV HQ off of State Street the last time I went through this process. My family tells me the DMV in Garden City can do the inspection also. I don't have any experience with the DMV in your neck of the woods.

Thanks Rix.

My DMV is only about 30 miles from there. But they insisted I had to have a Certificate of Origin.

What all did you have to show them? I assume some form of ownership or proof of purchase? Insurance?

Perhaps my DMV is more familiar with these type of vehicles now, and if not it's good that I can tell them it's been done.
 
3DTOPO said:
Rix said:
DMV inspection. I did mine at the DMV HQ off of State Street the last time I went through this process. My family tells me the DMV in Garden City can do the inspection also. I don't have any experience with the DMV in your neck of the woods.

Thanks Rix.

My DMV is only about 30 miles from there. But they insisted I had to have a Certificate of Origin.

What all did you have to show them? I assume some form of ownership or proof of purchase? Insurance?

Perhaps my DMV is more familiar with these type of vehicles now, and if not it's good that I can tell them it's been done.
I see your problem now. So I plated my 08 KTM SXF250 back in 2013, and I did have the MSO and was able to insure it because it had a 17digit VIN. I have not actually tried to plate my SurRon. I apologize for the misrepresentation. I figured the process would be the same, but I never considered the VIN and MSO issue.
 
Hey fellow surronsters, if someone has 21/18 wheel setup, what's your experience with range and power decrease, is it really noticeable? I have Nuc 24f with 60v/52ah battery, 54 sprocket fwiw. Also I guess I have to run lifting linkage to keep the right geometry?
Thanks!
 
I have a 21/19 setup (real MX rims, not the OEM 19" rim.) A wide 19" tire is as tall as a 21" tire so it keeps the bike level. I don't think you can get an 18" tire w/ a diameter as large as a 19". Not one that will still fit inside the swingarm at least. So, yes, I think you'd need a rear raising link if you wanted to keep the steering geometry the same.

Edit: I don't really notice a power decrease. I'm running a 60T rear. W/ a Nuc24F it does throttle wheelies at will. Still goes plenty fast so I'll replace w/ a 64T someday.
Don't know about the range difference. I don't think the wheels make too big a difference. I ride the crap out of it offroad w/ the Nuc24F so that's hard on range no matter how you cut it. I'm also running TuBliss in the rear w/ low pressure. That probably makes a much larger difference in range than the wheel diameter.
 
Want to Buy: stock Sur-Ron 19" front wheel in new or good condition shipped to 24060 USA ..

lots of ppl upgrade their wheels so if anyone wants to sell me a stock front wheel plz let me know:)
 
Rix said:
3DTOPO said:
Rix said:
DMV inspection. I did mine at the DMV HQ off of State Street the last time I went through this process. My family tells me the DMV in Garden City can do the inspection also. I don't have any experience with the DMV in your neck of the woods.

Thanks Rix.

My DMV is only about 30 miles from there. But they insisted I had to have a Certificate of Origin.

What all did you have to show them? I assume some form of ownership or proof of purchase? Insurance?

Perhaps my DMV is more familiar with these type of vehicles now, and if not it's good that I can tell them it's been done.
I see your problem now. So I plated my 08 KTM SXF250 back in 2013, and I did have the MSO and was able to insure it because it had a 17digit VIN. I have not actually tried to plate my SurRon. I apologize for the misrepresentation. I figured the process would be the same, but I never considered the VIN and MSO issue.

No problem and thanks for the explanation! Makes sense.
 
smdub said:
I have a 21/19 setup (real MX rims, not the OEM 19" rim.) A wide 19" tire is as tall as a 21" tire so it keeps the bike level. I don't think you can get an 18" tire w/ a diameter as large as a 19". Not one that will still fit inside the swingarm at least. So, yes, I think you'd need a rear raising link if you wanted to keep the steering geometry the same.

Edit: I don't really notice a power decrease. I'm running a 60T rear. W/ a Nuc24F it does throttle wheelies at will. Still goes plenty fast so I'll replace w/ a 64T someday.
Don't know about the range difference. I don't think the wheels make too big a difference. I ride the crap out of it offroad w/ the Nuc24F so that's hard on range no matter how you cut it. I'm also running TuBliss in the rear w/ low pressure. That probably makes a much larger difference in range than the wheel diameter.
Thanks m8, that's very helpful!
I guess 54T will not be enough for those large wheel, so have to get at least 60T. Btw what's your top speed with the current setup, I understand it's not the priority, but just for the sake of it :)
 
I think it goes almost 50mph w/ my setup. The larger wheel diameter and sprocket somewhat cancel each other. The 72V battery ups that by ~20% and field weakening w/ the Nuc 24F can take it even farther if enabled. I never go that fast on single track.

My rear tire is prob 10% taller than stock. So would requite a 10% larger sprocket to keep everything equal. 48T -> 53T.
 
smdub said:
I think it goes almost 50mph w/ my setup. The larger wheel diameter and sprocket somewhat cancel each other. The 72V battery ups that by ~20% and field weakening w/ the Nuc 24F can take it even farther if enabled. I never go that fast on single track.

My rear tire is prob 10% taller than stock. So would requite a 10% larger sprocket to keep everything equal. 48T -> 53T.
Thanks! 50mph is plenty. And I guess 60T is the way to go if I want to save the same torque I have now with 54T.
 
Have another question before finally pulling the trigger on the 21/18 setup: what rear rim size is preferable for the Sur ron, more heavier but also stickier 2.15'' or lighter and more agile 1.85''?
FWIW, I will probably go with Dunlop MX33 90/100-18 for heavier off-road and Shinko SR241 3.5-18 for trails and pavement.
 
A 3.5" SR251 is a *TIGHT* fit. You will have to dish the wheel a lot. That MX33 is even wider. You're going to need to shave the right side knobs off.
Why not a 19" rear? Any MX tire will be avail in that size (of course) and the SR251 is also avail in 19s.
 
smdub said:
A 3.5" SR251 is a *TIGHT* fit. You will have to dish the wheel a lot. That MX33 is even wider. You're going to need to shave the right side knobs off.
Why not a 19" rear? Any MX tire will be avail in that size (of course) and the SR251 is also avail in 19s.
Now I'm confused :(
I thought 3.5''-18 pretty much equals 90/100-18 and 90/100-18 is what Woodys Wheel Works recommends for his 18'' wheel. He even said no offset needed for SR241, and just 1/8'' for MX33. Shaving the knobs is not an option for me btw.
As to why the 18'', mainly because it's smaller and lighter, and with lifting link it's easier to have the bike's geometry in check, but that's just from the research and not first hand experience.
https://chargedcycleworks.com/pages/sur-ron-tire-upgrade-specs-and-weights. here's also some info about fitment, and it seems like mx33-18 should fit, probably with some dishing and footpeg adjustment/removal, though.
 
Speaking of not wanting to shave knobs off - The number one thing I wish for my Sur Ron is a wider swing arm. I want to run 4" or even 5" bicycle fat tires.

I've seen a few like this:
https://www.surronpitstop.com/forum/community-posts/custom-swingarm-and-seats

But as far as I can tell, I can't actually buy one anywhere. Anyone out there know a solution? Anyone hack an off-the-shelf dirt bike swing arm to fit or something?

Fabricating one would be a really fun project, but I don't think I have time to get to it in the foreseeable future.
 
smdub said:
I'm also running TuBliss in the rear w/ low pressure. That probably makes a much larger difference in range than the wheel diameter.
I've started researching Nuetech TuBliss and it seems they are lighter than standard tube not to mention HD ones? How do you feel about them, are they worth it? Is it hard to switch tires when running tubliss?
 
SolarBeaver said:
smdub said:
I'm also running TuBliss in the rear w/ low pressure. That probably makes a much larger difference in range than the wheel diameter.
I've started researching Nuetech TuBliss and it seems they are lighter than standard tube not to mention HD ones? How do you feel about them, are they worth it? Is it hard to switch tires when running tubliss?

It's horseshit; don't trouble yourself about it.
 
Chalo said:
SolarBeaver said:
smdub said:
I'm also running TuBliss in the rear w/ low pressure. That probably makes a much larger difference in range than the wheel diameter.
I've started researching Nuetech TuBliss and it seems they are lighter than standard tube not to mention HD ones? How do you feel about them, are they worth it? Is it hard to switch tires when running tubliss?

It's horseshit; don't trouble yourself about it.
Why so? On paper it seems great...
 
SolarBeaver said:
smdub said:
A 3.5" SR251 is a *TIGHT* fit. You will have to dish the wheel a lot. That MX33 is even wider. You're going to need to shave the right side knobs off.
Why not a 19" rear? Any MX tire will be avail in that size (of course) and the SR251 is also avail in 19s.
Now I'm confused :(
I thought 3.5''-18 pretty much equals 90/100-18 and 90/100-18 is what Woodys Wheel Works recommends for his 18'' wheel. He even said no offset needed for SR241, and just 1/8'' for MX33. Shaving the knobs is not an option for me btw.
As to why the 18'', mainly because it's smaller and lighter, and with lifting link it's easier to have the bike's geometry in check, but that's just from the research and not first hand experience.
https://chargedcycleworks.com/pages/sur-ron-tire-upgrade-specs-and-weights. here's also some info about fitment, and it seems like mx33-18 should fit, probably with some dishing and footpeg adjustment/removal, though.
Well the 3.00x18" shinko 244 is 3.5" wide on 2.15 rim so you cant trust manufactures sizing, they are all different in reality.
That combo fits fine on a centered rim.
I see just over 4" tire clearance in the swingarm, dished wheel required.
Move the bottom kickstand spring anchor to the top & use a shorter bolt for the bottom to gain more clearance there.
 
SolarBeaver said:
Chalo said:
SolarBeaver said:
smdub said:
I'm also running TuBliss in the rear w/ low pressure. That probably makes a much larger difference in range than the wheel diameter.
I've started researching Nuetech TuBliss and it seems they are lighter than standard tube not to mention HD ones? How do you feel about them, are they worth it? Is it hard to switch tires when running tubliss?

It's horseshit; don't trouble yourself about it.
Why so? On paper it seems great...

Other people report liking them in this thread. Maybe try searching for more opinions?

Personally I've been running tubeless (not TuBliss) for years and couldn't be happier.
 
SolarBeaver said:
Chalo said:
SolarBeaver said:
I've started researching Nuetech TuBliss and it seems they are lighter than standard tube not to mention HD ones? How do you feel about them, are they worth it? Is it hard to switch tires when running tubliss?

It's horseshit; don't trouble yourself about it.
Why so? On paper it seems great...

Adding tires to a tire makes it heavier and slower and more complicated to service. Tubeless is already a non-benefit, trading fixing flats in the field for dicking around with your tires constantly and making a huge mess.

It's like folks assume nobody has been thinking about these things for the last 150 years.

Whatever you think is the awesome new thing for your bike? It's been tried. A long, long time ago, and it was found to be lacking/sucking. That's why your bike didn't already have it.
 
Chalo said:
Tubeless is already a non-benefit, trading fixing flats in the field for dicking around with your tires constantly and making a huge mess.

To use your vernacular that is horseshit. Sounds like someone who doesn't have much experience going tubeless. You can't buy a high-end bicycle these days that tubeless isn't standard.

I was going through inner tubes like clean socks - tearing stem after stem. Now I haven't needed a single tube in years, and I've only had to add some fluid once in over two years from the initial conversion.

Plus, tubeless can seal punctures on the trail. There are many many advantages. Another is reduced spinning mass and allows for lower pressure than you can run on a tube.
 
Dude, I have had at least a dozen coworkers for years now, who constantly dick around with their tubeless horseshit and make huge messes. These are pro mechanics! I can't even imagine the abominations that The Public come up with.

You're in denial. In twenty years you're going to be making fun of yourself for having fallen for it.

P.S. - The lowest pressure you can run in a tubed or tubeless tire is what keeps the rim from bashing the ground. That the same pressure either way. Stop repeating lies somebody told you.
 
Chalo said:
Dude, I have had at least a dozen coworkers for years now, who constantly dick around with their tubeless horseshit and make huge messes. These are pro mechanics! I can't even imagine the abominations that The Public come up with.

You're in denial. In twenty years you're going to be making fun of yourself for having fallen for it.

Dude - just cause you must of been around people who must not of known what they are doing.

My Yeti - cost nearly $10k came tubeless. No issue with it in years. Only one squirt from a syringe needed. No big mess or deal.

My Sur Ron has had no issues with tubeless in years. Same thing - only one squirt from a syringe.
 
I deal with ex-tubeless stuff on the daily. Covered with heavy, sticky scabs. The tires will barely tear off the rim. No thanks.

I stand by my prediction that you'll make fun of yourself for buying the hype.
 
Chalo said:
I deal with ex-tubeless stuff on the daily. Covered with heavy, sticky scabs. The tires will barely tear off the rim. No thanks.

I stand by my prediction that you'll make fun of yourself for buying the hype.

You seriously crack me up.

It's not a matter of buying into any hype - they have more than proven themselves - for years and thousands of trouble-free miles.

It just works if you do it proper - even in a foot of snow when it's 10 below out I have not had an issue.
 
3DTOPO said:
Chalo said:
I deal with ex-tubeless stuff on the daily. Covered with heavy, sticky scabs. The tires will barely tear off the rim. No thanks.

I stand by my prediction that you'll make fun of yourself for buying the hype.

You seriously crack me up.

It's not a matter of buying into any hype - they have more than proven themselves - for years and thousands of trouble-free miles.

It just works if you do it proper - even in a foot of snow when it's 10 below out I have not had an issue.

Whatever. I've probably dealt with a thousand times as many bikes as you have, for more than thirty years. What do I know? Only the paltry things that direct experience can teach you.

Check in with me in 20 to let me know what you think about tubeless with sealant.

Why do you think nobody uses it except bike wankers? When's the last time you heard of Stan's or Orange Seal in a car, or a motorcycle? A wheelbarrow? Literally anything else?
 
Back
Top