DRIVE WITH MASHED UP BEARING FIXED AND DONE 120 MILES WITH NO ISSUES!
I wanted to wait until the rebuilt drive had got a few miles under its belt before reporting a final closure post.
I got the drive rebuilt with a new bearing. I had a few issues...
I had to sand with very fine wet and dry paper the hole for the of the new bearing as however I tried I couldnt push the new one in straight. Still seemed very tight but just a fine hone with the paper made it go in square.
The 2nd bearing I removed from the sort of triangular plate that you had to remove with the jacking screws. I removed this because it was kinda notchy and I thought it was bad. To my surprise when it was removed from the aluminium piece it ran more freely? I checked this bearing every way I knew and concluded it was good as new so I pushed it back in, it ran very slightly notchy again! So I took it out... it ran freely? By this point I was pretty sure, as strange as it sounds that when it was pushed in the pressure was deforming the race somehow? So I honed this the same with wet and dry and it pushed in a little easier but still tightly and ran smooth not notchy! I dont believe a race can deform but thats what I seemed to find?
I didnt actually know how to refit the two locking ring/nuts that hold the crank bearings in place. I could see the principle. One ring tightens up the bearing, the second is a lock ring that you lock onto the first to stop it undoing, the same principle as wheel bearings on a bike wheel or the main mounting system of the motor to the bike. The problem was that the first lockring/nut went into the casing too far to be able to hold whilt tightening the outer one onto it? I could get a pair of circlip pliers onto the outer one but the inner one was behind it shrouded by the casing? I ended up using a trial and error method of backing off the inner one and tightening the outer one onto it. The first few times it ended up too tight and the crank would hardly turn! Eventually I got it just about right, a little on the tight side but I thought rather that than too loose. There must be a better way but I cant see how you could get any tool in there to hold the inner one?
I lost one of the chain guard screws! Haven't found it 2 weeks later, hope its not in the motor!
I reassembled with some old tin of grease I had lying around called something like albeda grease. It looked a nice golden colour! The only other stuff i had was cv joint grease and was black and nasty looking and I didn't want it messing up my newly cleaned motor! I was a bit concerned that if it was petroleum based maybe it would melt the nylon cog or something? I considered getting all grease stressy and doing a load of research only to buy something made from synthetic turnip pulp or soneshit for like £30, so I just thought "to hell with it" and just turned a blind eye, grease is grease in my garage, its lucky it got any at all after the stress this motor gave me! So far so good, I packed plenty in for good measure.
When I first ran it off the bike and loosely in the frame I was disapointed, it didnt seem whisper quiet. I couldn't really remember how loud it was but after all the work I had put in I wanted it to be super quiet. Anyway it seemed to run okay and wasnt making any "bad" noises just a motor whirring noise. When it was bolted into the bike frame and the chain put on I felt better as the wheel/chain/pedal rotation noises seemed to mask the sound. On the road I realised I was being stoopid, its as quiet as the day it was new. Compared to the racket it made with a shot bearing its awesome!
It still has all the power it used to albeit with a slight disadvantage of a 50% filled slime tyre that weighs a ton! The added rotational weight seems to work the motor very slightly harder but the ride is superb. I think top speed is down by maybe 1 to 2 kph although that is very hard to measure, I feel the added 'flywheel' effect feels nice actually.
I looked into getting solid tyres to try. The only ones I could find didnt get good reviews (by normal cyclists that have to contend with the weight issue) but more to the point they required stretching over the rim and from what I can tell if the tyre is flexible enough to do this it must be too soft to give a good ride. They were expensive and seemed really difficult to fit etc.
I tried to research the effect of completely filling the tyre with liquid. This is almost never done on a bicycle or in fact any type of vehicle as far as I can tell, however I knew that if you could ever fill it completely with liquid (slime) under hydraulic pressure it should be rock hard, well thats what I thought. I knew I couldn't do this and it would probably be stupid heavy so went for an "experimental" tube 700C x 23 with a shoot load of slime in it, 50% roughly. The logic being with 50% less air to compress I thought it would seem harder at the same pressure than a straight air filled one. For some reason the tyre feels just as resistant to pinching/collapsing as before (i.e. still acts as if its just as "hard"), but the ride is more cushioned. I think it changes the characteristics of the tyre for the better and with less air in it when you hit a bump the pressure inside the tyre must rise more sharply and give more support.
The next thing I want to try is I have seen this stuff which i think is called ''aero gel''. Basically I want to find a substance that has the characteristics of water or slime but is lighter. I think aero gel is what my girlfriend has bought to put flowers in, it kind of swells up to form squishy balls when you add water. It holds the water but I'm thinking to do this it must have an element of 'structure'? Wonder if anyone has tried polystyrene balls? If you could get them small enough to fit in the tube, I want to try anything that displaces the air but is very light.
Anyway bike fixed and running fine. Thanks for all your help.