Atak_Snajpera
1 kW
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2022
- Messages
- 301
yep. fasterbikes.eu also have them in stock. Unfortunately price went up from 950 euro to over 1000 euro (motor only!)
-
Howdy! we're looking for donations to finish custom knowledgebase software for this forum. Please see our Funding drive thread
CYC PHOTON
- Thread starter pxl666
- Start date
Föppel
100 W
I think i will wait for the next gen of the Photon, hopefully with a biger motor that can do power levels like the BBSHD... the good torque sensing PAS sounds nice, but i also want >1500 W of power and not only for a short moment but permanent without overheating the motor.
raylo32
100 kW
That would be nice, but a motor capable of that will need to be a big ~13 pound lump like the BBSHD. Current Photon is a good compromise of power, weight and efficiency for bike pedalers. I'd like to have one bike with a BBSHD with torque sense. But that's not ever gonna happen.
Föppel
100 W
true...
Towards the weight, well im happy with the power to weight ratio of my X-1 Pro and its nice as for fun riding, where the noise from the open crankdrife design does not bother me. but the more integrated design of the Photon or BBSHD makes it imo way better for a bike i would use for daily riding to work.
If CYC manages to bring the power of the x-1 Pro in a Photon design, i would be happy
Chalo
100 TW
So what I hear is that you want to lay waste to your bike's gears expensively and often. Is that it?
Remember the motor is only one part of the system. You can overpower it as much as you like, but it won't increase the capabilities of your bike's transmission or remove its limitations.
Föppel
100 W
jop, i do that all the time
but also only within a certain limit. At my weight and by not using the smallest 2 gears of the cassette on a quality bike, im getting away with it at 1500w in daily use... i use dt-siwss hubs with ratchet freewheels on my builds, this may also help.
your right, therefore i think its important to to have a stable bike with quality parts as a basis.
Cassettes and chains are pretty cheap the last time I checked… gotta pay to play and it’s a very small cost every few hundred miles which takes most of us a long time to reach.
Chalo
100 TW
That depends on what components you use. A Microshift Acolyte 8 cassette runs about $30. Shimano XTR cassette is about $400. Neither one will last very long if you feed it 2hp regularly.
I think you're exaggerating a bit there... The cassette on my Marlin 8 is a SRAM PG-1210 Eagle 11-50T, 12 speed. They are around $50-$100 which isn't a big deal every year or two if you even put that many miles on it. It's considered routine maintenance when you run a motor like the Photon in unrestricted mode. BUT, if you let off the throttle when shifting like you're supposed to, it's a non issue and not much more wear than a standard bike if you have proper chain tension and gear selection.
As for the Shimano XTR Cassette, why the hell would you run one of those anyway? I feel like you literally just searched up the most expensive Cassette you could find to prove a point very poorly. You should know by now that having a 12 speed like I do or even an 11 speed XTR is pretty pointless on a eBike. Most people (smart ones) after they wear out their first cassette on their bike will probably upgrade to something actually eBike rated with only 7 or 8 speeds. Yes, that would require replacing the shifter and derailleur in most cases but that's a one time expense and still far less than the $400 you say your crappy XTR costs, if you even have one.
Chalo
100 TW
Search me, I think it's total nonsense. I mostly use 7-speed cassettes that cost about $20 retail. And I do that for the same reasons I gave up BBS02 for hub motors. They're cheap, reliable, durable, low maintenance, fault tolerant, widely available, and unpretentious. I put 30 miles a day on my e-bike, give or take, mostly getting to my bike shop jobs where I earn barely subsistence wages. I don't have resources to waste on trashing components, and if I did it would still bother me.
Here's an 8-speed e-bike rated cassette with an MSRP of $462:
XG-899 E-BLOCK Cassette - CS-XG-899-A1 - SRAM
XG-899 E-BLOCK Cassette, CS-XG-899-A1, SRAM. E-BLOCK™ shifting technology is a fundamental redevelopment of external drivetrain shifting. On the E-BLOCK™ cassette, the chain has a defined link po...
www.sram.com
Rotor's 13-speed cassette has an MSRP of $475.
13 Speed Cassette
Designed to pair with the ROTOR 1x13 system, this 13-speed cassette has range options for anything from crit racing to spinning up mountains on weeks-long adventure rides. We use a two-piece steel and aluminum construction to keep weight down without sacrificing durability. It is truly a...
rotoramerica.com
So XTR isn't the most expensive cassette I could think of. But it's something plenty of people are willing to pay for. Just not me.
raylo32
100 kW
raylo32
100 kW
LOL... my SW102 ordeal continues. This vendor could apparently F up a wet dream as we used to say. The good news was that they finally identified the issue and got in a stock of SW102s. But they wouldn't just send me a new one and wait for me to return the old one because some folks had apparently not been sending the bad ones back. So, they gave me two options. The one they recommended to get it faster was to purchase a new one from them, then send the old one back with RMA# for a refund. The second one was to send the old one back and THEN they would send out the new one. So, what did I get? A combination of the two.
I immediately purchased the new one ($80) and when it came I installed it same day, confirmed it was working properly, and sent them a thank you e-mail to let them know. Then I wrapped up the old one with RMA# enclosed and sent it back. A couple of weeks go by and I check the tracking... yes, it was delivered. Another week goes by, no refund.... then I start getting USPS tracking for an incoming package. I email them to ask what this is and the same person I told I had bought the new SW102 and sent the old one back e-mailed me back: "why that's your replacement SW102 for the Photon warranty issue". You literally can not make this stuff up. Oh, dear god, I have so had it with these people.
I immediately purchased the new one ($80) and when it came I installed it same day, confirmed it was working properly, and sent them a thank you e-mail to let them know. Then I wrapped up the old one with RMA# enclosed and sent it back. A couple of weeks go by and I check the tracking... yes, it was delivered. Another week goes by, no refund.... then I start getting USPS tracking for an incoming package. I email them to ask what this is and the same person I told I had bought the new SW102 and sent the old one back e-mailed me back: "why that's your replacement SW102 for the Photon warranty issue". You literally can not make this stuff up. Oh, dear god, I have so had it with these people.
Last edited:
Mongo
100 W
Eco Cycles seems back up, maybe giving us two decent East Coast vendors.
raylo32
100 kW
chinese ltwoo a5 with 50t is cheap as dirt and works quite well . I have two
Can anyone make recommendations for shorter cranks for the Photon? My left one has come loose 2x and I'm wanting to try shorter cranks anyway.
One of the Miranda products (Delta) at 155mm would be OK and affordable but I don't think these are straight as the CYC sourced ones are, and I definitely don't need more clearance.
Any other options, especially that people have experience with?
One of the Miranda products (Delta) at 155mm would be OK and affordable but I don't think these are straight as the CYC sourced ones are, and I definitely don't need more clearance.
Any other options, especially that people have experience with?
Chalo
100 TW
United Black Cotterless Cranks -150mm
United cotterless crank arms for distance riders. 102-mm, 8-inch, 12-inch. 110-mm & 127-mm, 20-inch wheel. Req. crank puller tool from dropdown menu.
www.unicycle.com
Would be good at that price but those are Cotterless/Square and Photon is ISIS.United Black Cotterless Cranks -150mm
United cotterless crank arms for distance riders. 102-mm, 8-inch, 12-inch. 110-mm & 127-mm, 20-inch wheel. Req. crank puller tool from dropdown menu.
However Unicycle have a wide range of ISIS cranks down to 75mm length and Q:0 (is that called pedalling or twiddling) but Nimbus VCX Cranks - 150mm look pretty good, so thanks for that.
From recollection the last time I rode a unicycle I think it had 100mm or so cranks, but it was a while ago
raylo32
100 kW
150? Thems some short cranks.
steve s
1 W
I use the shimano 8 speed hg400 11-40 They are about $30 and chains are dirt cheap too so I have a spare set ready to swap as soon as it gives any trouble.. 1400 miles so far.
Sure are. There's sometimes good reasons to consider shorter cranks, especially on ebikes and for shorter and older people, or where you might want to sustain a higher cadence (again - ebikes). Probably worth considering by people with knee or hip problems, too.
Edit: look at how many older people new to bikes buy an ebike and then learn to ride with the seat way too low. Shorter cranks would really help them. Of course, they could just raise the seat but they are never going to do that. Most don't even know of the existence of dropper posts.
Last edited:
Atak_Snajpera
1 kW
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2022
- Messages
- 301
Does really 1-2cm make a difference for you?
Disagree. Most people don't even know they exist.
Consider the use case for older and less confident ebikers - they always ride with the seat low so they can touch the ground when they stop around town, but for longer rides where this isn't a factor, a dropper could set the seat to the correct height. would definitely help their knees if they are putting in any effort at all.
There is also a use case for shared and family bikes - easy adjustment on the fly.
It isn't just about flying down a hillside.
Agree, I had really tighten mine just to stop the sloppy 34t chainring from rattling around.
The "Retaining Lock Ring" on the left side is equally problematic. CYC say to "hand tighten". Whatever that is.
If you don't tighten enough by hand, the bearing has enough resistance (actually, it has a lot of resistance, seemingly caused by the plastic sleeve) that the shaft will spin inside the plastic sleeve. If this happens the bearing interface becomes the inside surface of the plastic sleeve against the shaft; the actual bearing is not spinning at all. Far from ideal.
If you over tighten the ring by hand, you will destroy the two end bearings by over-preloading them. Not great either.
Last edited:
