Rollodo
1 kW
samsavvas said:Surely you mean to refer to the 'surface area presented by the rider' rather than 'weight of the rider' here? The weight of the rider would only have any bearing on 'resistance' when climbing an incline.
Above about 20km/h it's air resistance in its various forms that is the problem. There's a good explanation here: http://mccraw.co.uk/wind-resistance-cycling-speed/
I've often though that the only real justification for a drive such as the BBS01 is to assist bicycle users to overcome air resistance (particularly when cycling into the wind) sufficiently to avoid turning to the car! In other words, to be able to cycle at around 25km/h consistently and in all conditions.
Actually, I meant the weight itself, though the surface area is, as you pointed out, the primary culprit. Picture Rider A who weights 100 kg with some body fat on him and surface area X. Now picture Rider B who lifts weights, so he has more muscles, covering the same surface area X, but weighting 110 kg, since muscles are more dense than fat. You now have more downward force onto the bicycle, which creates more drag. Is this correct?
EDIT: dense, not sense.