The M4 Optibike series is $6500 and has 400W. This has 250W. Apples to apples.
4REEE said:The M4 Optibike series is $6500 and has 400W. This has 250W. Apples to apples.
Didn't know the M4 was in full production, so I went with what they had on their website: The R-Series.
I was just hoping that these bikes (Trek, Giant, Haibike) would be wayyyyyy less than $6K USD.
That Optibike M4 doesn't look nearly as nice as the full suspension Giant. :wink:
I doubt Trek or Giant will release their e-bikes in the US market anytime soon for various reasons.
4REEE said:The only problem I have with the AVE xh11 is that the battery capacity is a tiny 8 Ah.
but that would just put so much more tension load in the chain and create more sprocket wear,..especially at low speed.Bike Xing said:With all the real estate dedicated to that drive they should've put the transmission in there and thrown the rear derailleur in the trash where it belongs.
Hi GerardThe old bosch motor seems pretty good, the newer one should be even better.
For a person that wants to build their own DH E MTB without access to a machine shop, this is not a bad option at the price.
Some will think $1000 for a good set of forks is a steal.
You'd be very surprised how far 8ah will take you on a bosch.
If you don't pedal and only use full power then it might be low but I did 42 miles the other day here in Germany on the Raleigh and only used 20% of the battery using it only for hills.
speedmd said:To me, the factory mid drives as nice as they appear are twice as expensive as the market will bare. I see them all killing each other to grab at crumbs as the low priced kits continue getting better and have more options.
4REEE said:That Optibike M4 doesn't look nearly as nice as the full suspension Giant. :wink:
True that.
I doubt Trek or Giant will release their e-bikes in the US market anytime soon for various reasons.
With very little competition, it sounds like the mid-drive market will remain expensive in the US... At least until Haibikes come in through Currie.
Hillhater said:but that would just put so much more tension load in the chain and create more sprocket wear,..especially at low speed.Bike Xing said:With all the real estate dedicated to that drive they should've put the transmission in there and thrown the rear derailleur in the trash where it belongs.
Bigger sprocket on the wheel , keeps the chain loads lower.
Small sprocket on the front,..keeps the motor & gear train speed higher = less torque loading, less gearing reduction, less friction losses !
So you think mid drives should be bout 3k? Due to market or value?
I will say 5k is more in line with a fair retail price.
speedmd said:So you think mid drives should be bout 3k? Due to market or value?
I will say 5k is more in line with a fair retail price.
I don't agree, Anything much over $2500 starts to become a market killer for a 8AH 20mph novelty commuter. Maybe when things pick up a bit the market may improve, but not how the economy is treading water now. Just my opinion. Keep a look at the kits / bikes coming out of the east. I think it's going to be a blood bath.
Bike_on said:Hillhater said:but that would just put so much more tension load in the chain and create more sprocket wear,..especially at low speed.Bike Xing said:With all the real estate dedicated to that drive they should've put the transmission in there and thrown the rear derailleur in the trash where it belongs.
Bigger sprocket on the wheel , keeps the chain loads lower.
Small sprocket on the front,..keeps the motor & gear train speed higher = less torque loading, less gearing reduction, less friction losses !
also = less speed and gear range. Part of the value of a mid drive is the optimum motor speed under various speeds and loads and one needs a good gear range to do that.
Nice point HH about chain tension and wear. I count that as the trade off for the mid drive. Rohloff speed hub and nuvinci and great alt to cassettes, but they may have more losses too.
crossbreak said:Guess you've missed the point: The new bosch an overdrive gearbox for the cranks that induces additional drag to the cranks. Motor does not feel any more comfortable than before, over all reduction stays almost the same for the motor, it just uses less reduction to the output sprocket. Rider feels less comfortable due additional drag by the additional overdrive gearbox.
No doubt, with higher chain speeds, chain stress would be reduced. But i doubt they increased chain speed. They just left it as it was and still use tiny 11T sprockets on the wheel that fail frequently.
Better yet an internal hub? like a nexux 7 or 8Bike Xing said:By "small crank" do you all mean the tiny "chainring" or sprocket attached to the crank? That thing is tiny? Does it spin faster than the crank? Maybe the internals increase the rotational speed of the crank to reduce torque all the way through to the "crank / chainring".
With all the real estate dedicated to that drive they should've put the transmission in there and thrown the rear derailleur in the trash where it belongs.
o00scorpion00o said:speedmd said:So you think mid drives should be bout 3k? Due to market or value?
I will say 5k is more in line with a fair retail price.
I don't agree, Anything much over $2500 starts to become a market killer for a 8AH 20mph novelty commuter. Maybe when things pick up a bit the market may improve, but not how the economy is treading water now. Just my opinion. Keep a look at the kits / bikes coming out of the east. I think it's going to be a blood bath.
The 2013 Bosch bikes are 11 ah.
The haibike I bought is a very high quality bike and I'm more than willing to pay for something that works, I have 650 miles on the bike in 3.5 weeks and would have a lot more,only I'm in Germany since Sunday. So I use it a lot and can justify the spending.
I've seen some awful cheap Chinese bikes that look and cycle like cheap shit, and are good if people don't care about quality or are simply not willing to spend money on a good quality bike. As a commuter who doesn't want to pedal they are fine.
People spend 7 thousand euros and more on normal bikes with carbon.
You can buy a bomber for the cost of a 2nd hand car if you want power but eventually the law will come down hard on bomber power. That to me is crazy money, nice bike but it is far from being a bicycle.
Bosch also have the S pedelec which will do 30 mph but can't be used on cycle lanes. The S pedelec is above the legal limit for most places. But it is an option if the 17 mph limit of the normal bike is too low for some.
I won't be going back to hubs any time soon as the Bosch with its 500 watts has pulled me up places that owners of a hub motor can only dream of. To me the health benefits alone of cycling far out weigh the cost of the bike. If I only used it once a month then it would be a waste. My health has improved greatly since I converted my bike with the mac, my knees are a different matter and so the bike is essential to me now but hopefully my weak muscles will improve.
I used to complain of the limit on the Bosch before I bought it but I can pedal at 20 mph on level ground with little wind and I'm getting much needed exercise which also makes me feel good after. A lot more should be done to encourage people to cycle and to get as much exercise as possible and that won't happen on bikes with throttle only.
I believe there will come a time when the law will catch on and come down hard on illegal bikes and conversions or like New York, completely ban them. But the law is there already in the E.U to govern e-bikes so that can't happen with legal bikes the limits are there for good reasons and I know that's hard for some here on ES to understand. I doubt the 20 mph and throttle will be allowed in the U.S forever, especially if thousands of bikes start selling.
o00scorpion00o said:I just can't understand why bosch didn't use 3 chainrings, simple, cheap and efficient.