BiGH
100 kW
I'm having a debate with Albie at the moment, about whether any of these systems would work (they're all 2wd systems)
clearly a 407 front and 407 rear motor with matching controllers ran off the same throttle would be fine (both running the same voltage).
ok now what if we were to have two controller of different max amperage...
rear: 407 with 72v 50a controller
front: 407 with 72v 35a controller
would this stop back emf issues, and allow the rear to provide more of the power used in acceleration?
ok now what about this if you used a front 406 and rear 407.
rear: 407 with 72v 35a controller
front: 406 with 72v 35a controller
this means the front has less low down torque, so the rear provides more power while moving slowly, the front takes precident at higher speeds because it would want a higher speed. but as the torque is lower at high speed, less stress would be placed on front dropouts..
ok time to throw this open - what does everyone think? is my reasoning wrong here?
clearly a 407 front and 407 rear motor with matching controllers ran off the same throttle would be fine (both running the same voltage).
ok now what if we were to have two controller of different max amperage...
rear: 407 with 72v 50a controller
front: 407 with 72v 35a controller
would this stop back emf issues, and allow the rear to provide more of the power used in acceleration?
ok now what about this if you used a front 406 and rear 407.
rear: 407 with 72v 35a controller
front: 406 with 72v 35a controller
this means the front has less low down torque, so the rear provides more power while moving slowly, the front takes precident at higher speeds because it would want a higher speed. but as the torque is lower at high speed, less stress would be placed on front dropouts..
ok time to throw this open - what does everyone think? is my reasoning wrong here?