Crystalyte 4840 with TO-247 fets

Farfle

100 kW
Joined
Jun 27, 2010
Messages
1,759
Location
Redmond OR
Planning on putting 6 of these IRFP4468PBF Fets In a crystalyte 4840 12-fet board, It has been modded with a CA tap, regen, and to run high-voltage, it has 100v caps 10ga wire etc... About the Fets, There are better Fets out there for sure, but from what I could find they are the best cost/performance for a large package fet. 7 bucks gets you a 100v 2Mohm Rdson, 195a package limited, 290a silicon limited fet with very similar gate characteristics to a pair of 4110's, but should give a slight reduction In on resistance, zero current sharing problems and a much better thermal pathway. The Fets will be spring-clipped to a piece of 1"x 3/16" copper bar with several laptop heatsinks soldered to it.hoping to have it look something like this: (picture soon) can any of the super controller savvy people comment on this?

heres the datasheet:

http://www.irf.com/product-info/datasheets/data/irfp4468pbf.pdf
 
Does this controller normally accept TO-247 FETs? Or are you going to modify the board?
 
number1cruncher said:
Does this controller normally accept TO-247 FETs? Or are you going to modify the board?


Nope, normally a standard to-220 controller, im taking every other fet out, turning a 12-fet into a 6-fet. I drew it all up in a cad program and they will fit, not in the existing box however.
 
Farfle, I'm not sure you come out ahead using six IRFP4468's vs. twelve IRFB4110's. Comparing two 4110's to a single 4468, I get the following numbers:

Theta-js
4110's = 0.45C/W
4668 = 0.54C/W

Rds-on (typ @ room temp)
4110's = 1.85mOhm
4668 = 2.0mOhm

Continuous Current (wire bond limited)
4110's = 240A
4668 = 195A

Total Gate Charge
4110's = 300nC
4668 = 360nC

For all the specs, it appears that a pair of 4110's beats out a single 4668.
I haven't compared prices though and six 4668's could share current better than twelve 4110's (perhaps only if the board is redesigned to be smaller though). And, of course, a single 4668 takes up a lot less room than the two 4110's. :)
 
Sorry for the confusion, the Fets this controller is built with are 4310s, these guys: http://www.irf.com/product-info/datasheets/data/irfs4310.pdf

Will do some test-to-destruction with the 4310s to see how much they can really take, then ill replace them with the big guys and test them to almost-destruction :D . dont want to blow them up just yet.
 
18FET board modded to 12x TO-247 package FETs = worthwhile upgrade
12FET board modded to 6x TO-247 package = going backwards

18_FET_PCB_PACKAGE_UPGRADE.JPG
 
hmm, it may be a small step backwards. but the Fets are already on the way, hopefully ill be pleasantly surprised. If not, it at least proves that its dooable
 
Have you considered the gate capacitance? Some of the drivers on these controllers are pretty wimpy.
 
Hello!

I realise that idea in my infineon after its blowing !
blowup
index.php


index.php


index.php


index.php


index.php


preparing aluminum base
index.php


index.php


forming FET pins
index.php


mounting FETs
index.php


this show general idea of mounting TO247
index.php


sorry for my bad english.
more details in our e-bike forum http://electrotransport.ru/ussr/index.php/topic,5513.msg138345.html#msg138345
 
You did that on 12 series? What sort of current were you running!

Interesting mod - with the condition of the board I would have tossed it myself :)

Still running the original caps? Thats the first thing I changed on mine - to very low ESR caps

Link for anyone else whose Russian is a little rusty :mrgreen:

http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Felectrotransport.ru%2Fussr%2Findex.php%2Ftopic%2C5513.msg138345.html%23msg138345&act=url

Edit: UGH - google translate's Rushlish is almost as good as Chinglish... :roll:
 
Back
Top