While I am supposed to be the anti-renewables jerk I like to try and keep this Elon Musk thread positive, Elon Musk makes most people happy and gives hope.
Here is new news and pictures on Starlink's new "UFO on a STICK", looks good.
https://www.tesmanian.com/blogs/tesmanian-blog/ufo-starlink-terminal?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
Thought I would *ADD* to this post, cos I just cracked open a beer and I am bored.
article quote
"Every deployment of 60 satellites can deliver 1 terabit of bandwidth, which could potentially support 40,000 users streaming high-definition content simultaneously. "
1 terabit of bandwidth = 1,000,000mbits
1,000,000mbits / 40,000 = 25mbps each, 25mbps is plenty of bandwidth to high definition video.
Folks should know that Google has been very busy in the new video codecs world, their new AV1 codec is out which is the next major video codec technology over their previous VP9 video codec and is truly next generation.
It should be basic common knowledge for people to know that they can save 50% of their internet bandwidth using Google's AV1 codec which is from the same group that created VP9, when watching video.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AV1
Wikipedia quote
In 2018 Facebook testing that approximates real world conditions, AV1 achieved 34%, 46.2% and 50.3% higher data compression than libvpx-vp9, x264 high profile, and x264 main profile respectively.
Most smart-TV devices only support old x264 so they can effectively cut their internet bandwidth usage in HALF if they get a an AV1 device when using YouTube and Netflix.
Netflix and YouTube are ITCHING for you to use AV1 codec because it saves them a ton of bandwidth and money.
For example if you go to your YouTube playback account settings you will see almost the only options there are to only use AV1 decode if you have a supported device
https://www.youtube.com/account_playback
AV1 settings
Always prefer AV1
There is a video codec competitor the evil H.265
Almost all the major tech companies see it as a "wall street vampire squid" organisation/vicious patent troll sitting on old dated compression algorithms and standing in the way of people getting affordable high quality streaming, IMO.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Efficiency_Video_Coding
Wikipedia quote
The licensing fees are one of the main reasons HEVC adoption has been low on the web and is why some of the largest tech companies (Amazon, AMD, Apple, ARM, Cisco, Google, Intel, Microsoft, Mozilla, Netflix, Nvidia, and more) have joined the Alliance for Open Media,[9] which finalized a royalty-free alternative video coding format AV1 on March 28, 2018
IMO, I think the tech giants like Google and Netflix see the people behind H.265 as nothing but vicious patent trolls sitting on dated and simple trivial compression algorithms for completely unreasonable amounts of money, maybe old broadcast media organisations are also behind it.
There a multiple hardware encoders for AV1, some of them are so fast they are so fast they can encode to AV1 in real-time
https://www.microcontrollertips.com/al-e210-multi-format-video-encoder-hardware-ip-av1/
AOMedia was formed in 2015 by industry leaders such as Google, Netflix, Intel, Microsoft with the charter to provide an open-source, royalty-free alternative to H.265/HEVC and other standards while improving the compression rate and delivering the same video quality at lower bitrate.
...
The AL-E210 is the first video encoder IP to implement real-time and file-based encoding in AV1 format up to 4K/UHD resolutions
Microsoft historically love to pay for licences like video codecs and embed them in their operating system for their software, this is why MS Edge/Explorer have always been able to play Netflix in full 4k with HDR with no problems.
MS typically like doing this because it gives them advantages over software competitors and costs little for them because they can bake-in better-competing software deals via mass licencing and also trade in their own patents with patent pools.
For Microsoft to take a different path against their traditional model means they saw costs for H.265 were too high or MS feared that the people behind H.265 would later change their mind and drastically hike the license cost price later down the road, or a combination of both.
All up MS taking a different path suggests extreme greed on H.265's behalf, IMO.
So in summary what this all means is that 60 Starlink stats should be able to serve not just 40,000 people watching HD video but instead
80,000 people if they are using the new AV1 video compression codec.
For AV1 the processors for hardware decoding and encoding are available.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AV1#Hardware
Intel's next major CPU/GPU will have native AV1 decode.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Leaked-slides-confirm-Tiger-Lake-U-Gen12-Xe-s-2x-graphics-boost-over-Ice-Lake-a-new-FIVR-implementation-and-HW-accelerated-12-bit-HEVC-VP9-encode-decode.466447.0.html
This wikipedia chart needs updating, where AV1 decode support is just blank/empty, but all the latest tech sites say its there for Tiger Lake CPUs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Quick_Sync_Video#Hardware_decoding_and_encoding
Google's new "ChromeCast" is going to be a TV box style with its own UI and comes with a dedicated remote.
https://www.xda-developers.com/google-android-tv-dongle-remote-ui/
https://www.androidpolice.com/2020/06/16/everything-we-know-about-googles-upcoming-android-tv-dongle-code-named-sabrina/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLCoaEDBre0&feature=emb_logo
[youtube]gLCoaEDBre0[/youtube]
Google's Sabrina Android TV box is rumored to have the Amlogic S905X2 chip, this means it can't hardware decode AV1, but the next level up the S905X4 can hardware decode AV1.
Wikipedia quote
Amlogic S905X4 (Q4 2019): Mid-range SoC pin-compatible with S905X2 and -X3 processors. Adds 4k 120fps AV1 decoding
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amlogic#Media_player_SoCs_(S8_&_S9_family_gen_4)
So the S905X4 is literally pin-compatible with S905X2, so it requires almost nothing for Google change over to AV1 capable S905X4 chips when they want to, maybe next year for Googles next TV box after this upcoming version?
Anyway the whole thing is coming together nicely to work with Elon Musk's Starlink dream, IMO.