mxs said:
I speak the language of the narrator in the video, so I am not just reading caption....it’s either satire, a very pissed off customer or very badly assembled bike ..... you pick. If the bike was truly received in this shape, I would already sent it back long time ago, without riding it.
This is Stag Motorcycles position on Drill One/RevX. We agreed with a UK distributor to sell RevX we wanted upgrades to that awful seat, a battery meter and a better mode switch. Our first RevX’s came from CZEM (they had an agreement to distribute RevX) ReVX and CZEM then parted ways, but CZEM was now selling the same bike made by the same manufacturers, the Drill one came with all the upgrades (except bashplate) that we had asked for and having sold 2 of these bikes already, we sold 2 more.
Both the new bikes we had we had to refund the customers and within 3 weeks we returned them to the distributor they had not managed 10 miles between them.
However Bob Mrazek you need to be more honest with customers:
Question 1 Why did you let CZEM take your design and you not do anything, there is more to the story?
Question 2 Why won’t you put a warranty on a bike that is not restricted to 60km/h?
Question 3 Why don’t you have bikes to sell?
Stag Motorcycles has nothing further to do with either brand (other than support our customer who bought the first 2 RevX’s). We helped put you on the map and it’s a shame because the bike could have been a good Bike but:
A/you cannot sell a performance bike like this and restrict it to 60km/h oh and ask for payment before the bike is manufactured.
B/ You cannot assemble a premium bike in a DIY store.
Best of luck to both brands and our apologies to those who followed our review on the CZEM RevX and went and bought a Drill One our RevX customer will testify how good those bikes could have been.