Futterama
1 kW
And thin parallel is even better due to shorter wire length than twisted.Lebowski said:closer together is better so thin twisted magnet wire is better than the thick isolated stuff i used in the first post.
And thin parallel is even better due to shorter wire length than twisted.Lebowski said:closer together is better so thin twisted magnet wire is better than the thick isolated stuff i used in the first post.
exactly!thin layer of katpon and you are set to go.
I didn't want to hold it with anything metal or heat conducting, so I used a miniature wooden clothespinFutterama said:I soldered the plates when holding both plates in a small vise. Lebowski, how did you hold the plates?
one at a time... and when soldering the second one the first one was still warm, so not too much heat loss there.Futterama said:That was probably my problem, the heat conducting vise. Did you hold both copper plates at the same time when soldering or did you solder one at a time?
Arlo1 said:Yup this is what I was talking about with the big stator I have. Maybe splitting it into 12 or 15 different 3 phase motors wound on one stator. Have each one on a fuse... If its one solid stator it would be ok to have dummy sections with a master section where only one section does the current measurement and coil position detection while the rest are a perfect copy of that.
liveforphysics said:You could match top fuel power densities with 27 of this module properly cooled (LN2? Dry ice?) forming a 9 lebowski stand alone units and a motor with some multiple of 9 teeth and each set kept separate so the motor ends up with 27 phase leads in 9 sets of electrically separated motors to power with the 9 stand alone, phase current controling and BEMF sensorless 6fets. Maybe throttle and enable signal to each unit is done over fiber. Intrensicly balanced current sharing possible with out the need for symetry in layout/packaging that makes the alternative approach too impractical to manufacturer. That type of array seems likely to become a high power EVs drive geometry to enable intrinsically safer lower voltage and higher current EV drives. It's going to be more efficient, cheaper, higher reliability with comparatively safe fails while-running situations (can limp on remaining non-failed functioning stages).
BigOutrunner said:This thread seems to have died despite its revolutionary potential as Luke pointed out above. Is Hotrod's / Njays suggestion about the caps significantly better or more correct leading to less interest in this? No responses to my previous query too.
Lebowski said:Well, as far as I am concerned this is not a discussion thread, more something that belongs in a wiki or reference section on how an output stage should be build.
Regarding Luke's suggestions, I wish I had the funds and time to try them out, but I don't so no reason for me to follow up there. A few thread above
it shows the output stage in my recumbent, which holds up very nicely at 100V and 32A phase (amplitude). I don't have a motor/vehicle combo that asks
for more power...
Adding all the caps on top as Hotrod suggested, I don't have the room for that in the controller box.
Last, for the output stage it doesn't matter how the motor is wound...
Arlo1 said:I have had plans for something along these lines for years and in have posts explain how I will do it but I need to get finished my power stage first then I will parallel them up. Most likely it will be 4 FETs in parallel and then multiple power stages parallel to either 3 6 9 or any multiple of 3 phase wires. I will do this to get the desired inductance and rpm per volt.!