If you've never researched it, how do you know whether they are superior or not? Just because a company used something and then stopped doesn't mean that thing is bad, just that they aren't using it. If you don't research *why*, then you don't know they are bad or good or indifferent.
Maybe they stopped using them because they cost more? Or the ones they wanted became unavailable? Or they changed engineers on design teams, and the new ones didn't know why they were used so they went with a different kind? Or maybe their marketing department didn't have any idea what tehy were talking about, and they weren't even the kind of part they said they were?
All of those reasons (and many more) have probably been true of one component or another in various companies over the years.
Unless you research them you wouldn't know.
Now, that said, a little (very little) research:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_bearing
So, best guess is that with computers set to common powersaving standards, which tend to spin drives down when not in use, tehy were having a lot of bearing failures and drives that didn't spin up anymore because of the frequent starts and stops.
That also implies it would be a bad idea to use this type of bearing on vehicles like ours, as they would almost never be at any constant speed for very long, and would see even more frequent stops/starts *under load*, and would probalby have a high failure rate.
There's some more info here:
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/The-Truth-About-Fluid-Dynamic-Bearing-FDB-Fans/1807
that may give some other data.
Another two minutes research also finds that at least most, perhaps all, of the PC harddisk industry uses FDB in their drives now. So if Maxtor stopped advertising it, it was possibly because everyone else changed over and now theirs was no longer unique. Marketing only cares about unique stuff--why bother wasting ad space to cry out things everyone has?
http://www.silentpcreview.com/Recommended_Hard_Drives
Maybe they stopped using them because they cost more? Or the ones they wanted became unavailable? Or they changed engineers on design teams, and the new ones didn't know why they were used so they went with a different kind? Or maybe their marketing department didn't have any idea what tehy were talking about, and they weren't even the kind of part they said they were?
All of those reasons (and many more) have probably been true of one component or another in various companies over the years.
Unless you research them you wouldn't know.
Now, that said, a little (very little) research:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_bearing
* In fluid static, hydrostatic and many gas or air bearings, the fluid is pumped in through an orifice or through a porous material.
* In fluid-dynamic bearings, the bearing rotation sucks the fluid on to the inner surface of the bearing, forming a lubricating wedge under or around the shaft.
Hydrostatic bearings rely on an external pump. The power required by that pump contributes to system energy loss, just as bearing friction otherwise would. Better seals can reduce leak rates and pumping power, but may increase friction.
Hydrodynamic bearings rely on bearing motion to suck fluid into the bearing, and may have high friction and short life at speeds lower than design, or during starts and stops. An external pump or secondary bearing may be used for startup and shutdown to prevent damage to the hydrodynamic bearing. A secondary bearing may have high friction and short operating life, but good overall service life if bearing starts and stops are infrequent.
So, best guess is that with computers set to common powersaving standards, which tend to spin drives down when not in use, tehy were having a lot of bearing failures and drives that didn't spin up anymore because of the frequent starts and stops.
That also implies it would be a bad idea to use this type of bearing on vehicles like ours, as they would almost never be at any constant speed for very long, and would see even more frequent stops/starts *under load*, and would probalby have a high failure rate.
There's some more info here:
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/The-Truth-About-Fluid-Dynamic-Bearing-FDB-Fans/1807
that may give some other data.
Another two minutes research also finds that at least most, perhaps all, of the PC harddisk industry uses FDB in their drives now. So if Maxtor stopped advertising it, it was possibly because everyone else changed over and now theirs was no longer unique. Marketing only cares about unique stuff--why bother wasting ad space to cry out things everyone has?
http://www.silentpcreview.com/Recommended_Hard_Drives