Chalo said:
Grautuefel said:
On a more serious note, do the kindernays really leak? Or is chalo being pessamistic. Because I got frustrated constantly adjusting the cable brakes on mine I replaced them with shimano hydraulics and have never looked back. Essentially maintenance free and always have the right pressure and grab.
I see a lot more hydraulic brakes that don't work right than ones that do. I assume a hydraulic shifter would see less pressure less often than a brake, and might leak less for that reason. Still it seems like it offers extra complication and points of failure for no benefit whatsoever.
I know you know quite a lot about bikes but here we really have different opinions. My disc brakes have been “fit and forget” kind of performance and i’ve worked as a bike messenger. 80-100km a day, 200 days per year. Racing and commuting at 15000-20000km per year.
Cable brakes on the other hand.. they got filled with muck, pulled coarsely, rust, stretch, broke, whatever. Replacement each year. I’ve used everything.. campagnolos, shimanos, hopes, dia-compes, Avids. cantilevers, V-s, discs, clams. “Sealed” cables. Gore-tex lined.. bla bla.
I’ve had rim brakes and rims totally covered with ice from subzero water splashes. No brakes..
I’ve had the same with discs. Ice was cracked off at first hard pressure from the pad.
Do you accept daily cleaning and maintenance as an acceptable part of using cable brakes or do you live in a warm, dry climate? I don’t get how you can see more failure points in a disc brake.