arkmundi
10 MW
Please sign the petition at http://www.change.org/petitions/a12...livonia-mi-factory-for-small-business-access#. Thank you!
... only if it works! http://articles.chicagotribune.com/...-20120822_1_a123-battery-maker-battery-demandsilverrich1 said:brilliant initiative, good job, well done, great work. signed.
So, the plan is for the American people to rescue this company by force of will. Step 1: everybody buys shares on the cheap. Step 2: get that factory window open for small business. Step 3: make the cells pervasive to the clean tech & green economy. Step 4: sit back and watch the stock price double, triple .... and we all benefit.A123 gets delisting notice from Nasdaq
(Reuters) - A123 Systems Inc , a lithium-ion battery maker backed by a $249 million U.S. government grant, received notice from the Nasdaq this week that its stock price is too low for exchange standards and will be delisted if it does not recover to $1 in the next six months.
A123 said in a securities filing on Wednesday that it has until February 19 to increase its share price back to $1, which it breached more than a month ago.
The stock closed at a lifetime low of 37 cents on the Nasdaq on Wednesday and has dropped more than 90 percent from its 12-month high in September 2011, hurt by the company's worsening cash position due to slower-than-expected demand and a pricey battery recall this year.
arkmundi said:Respectfully, this thread is about people who, because of the significant investment in this company by the American people, expect access to its product, that has proven itself in the context of light electric vechicles. "Hobbyist" are only one component, what I'd call tinkerers, people who experiment around with stuff and sometimes produce marketable goods & services. Apple Computer, now the most valued corporation in history started out in a garage that way.
I find it bizarre that in order to access the A123 cells, I needed to buy recycled cells from Hong Kong, cells stamped "Made in the USA", from a company headquartered in my backyard. The Petition is to open up a factory window. Of all the assets that will be ongoing through whatever restructuring might occur, it will be the factory. Production will continue. The need for access will continue. The petition and its "hopeful" goal are good. I'll never myself denigrate the hopeful, the dreamer, the visionary.
Anyway, just confirms that A123 needed the Fisker deal to work out, but it hasn't yet.Then, because of that stoppage and lagging sales projections, Fisker’s battery supplier, A123 Systems, laid off 125 employees after they received $249.1 million from generous U.S. taxpayers, plus $141 million in State of Michigan tax credits and subsidies. Once touted by former Michigan Governor Jennifer Granhom as another stimulus success, that doesn’t seem to be working out particularly great either. Well, except maybe, for China...
...Fisker’s production delay that resulted in DOE’s loan freeze was largely due to car fires and other problems caused by faulty batteries supplied by A123 Systems. A123, in turn, suffered a big setback when Fisker decreased orders.
The A123 investment plan is drawing scrutiny from some lawmakers. Becca Watkins, the spokeswoman for House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA), commented that such a deal “…raises more troubling questions about the direction of this government-led effort,” She added, “This acquisition appears to have been made possible by taxpayer funds made available through the stimulus.”
Well, if American taxpayers were provided access to a factory window, then we'd be well served, would we not? It means entrepreneaurs could forge development of LEV's of any ilk, and not just the Fisker's of the world. We'd then have a more meaningful transportation future than what we now have. I just don't see the average American household shoving out $100,000 for a karma.... and frankly 98 percent of the battery industry today is owned, operated and controlled by companies that are operating out of Korea, Japan and China.”
... If most of the battery industry is already controlled by Asian countries, how are interests of U.S. taxpayers possibly served by transferring technology enhancements they have subsidized at the expense of American competitiveness?
Unfortunately, however, no one bothered to check with the American public regarding what it wanted.