pipeking said:
Offroader said:
I do know many guys use 27.5" forks but I don't think they are pushing the bike extremely hard off-road and are not as sensitive as I am to the handling.
Please. I have hucked mine off some pretty big drops. I'll see if I can find some pics
Just to clarify things with this. I'm not talking about strength or rigidity of using a 27.5" on the bike. I'm specifically talking about changing the geometry of the bike which will make subtle changes to the handling of the bike.
Since I don't have the luxury of trying out different sized forks to see if there is a difference I can only go by what I have read. It does seem that the changes from a 26" to a 27.5" are too small to make a difference so it probably doesn't really matter, but the opinions are a little mixed.
A 27.5" will have a larger offset than a 26", it may also raise the front of the bike slightly, it may also change head tube angle. Some of the newer fox 27.5" forks are now coming out with a shorter offset than they did last year, so if you bought last year fox fork it will have a higher offset which will be more noticable.
A 27.5" may actually offer better higher speed performance, but may hurt lower speed. Low speed handling and turning feel are just as important to me as higher speed riding.
What I'm saying is I just don't know what these changes will do and bike frames are made with a particular sized fork in mind. Geometry is a big thing in the downhill bike racing community. They discuss all these geometry changes. I also know when going from my sur-ron to my other ebike, I can feel the sur-ron seems to feel just right and I don't want to mess around with it. I would think that the original designers of the bike, which made such an excellent bike, put a lot of thought into the correct sizes of tires and geometry.
My point of bringing this all up is that there may be changes in the bike feel and handling by changing things out and that this is highly discussed stuff in the downhill biking community which our bikes geometry are mostly taken from downhill biking as we use the suspension components from downhill biking. I really don't know much about this as I don't have the luxury of many forks in different sizes to try this stuff all out so I err on the side of caution here. I don't want to buy a $1200 fox 27.5" fork to then feel that the front of the bike is raised a bit higher and something feels slightly off with the bike.
I have never actually said this or that would be better, just trying to let you know that you will be changing things in the geometry with throwing different sized forks made for different sized frames on the bike. But it does seem that the changes between a 27.5 and 26" fork are not so drastic and you may get used to the changes very quickly and within a few rides it will feel normal to you.
I don't know why I'm even bringing this up to be honest because I bought the last forks fox made in 26", and then bought another brand 26" fork for my bike. I'm sitting on two 26" forks and I'm set for a long time or at least until the next sur-ron version comes out. If I had a choice between a 26" and 27.5" fork of the same model I would personally go for the 26" version to play it safe.