Kurt
10 kW
I will start off saying yes we all know even the biggest of the geared Bafang motors are still girly little motors and the 80- 100 has huge power potential that would fry the Bafang. I understand that. The point of this comparison is not to see what motor is the ultimate power beast. It's to compare the two drive systems under identical conditions. By this I mean Bike, wheel size, tyre, rim, battery, controller, rider are all identical, the only thing that changes is the motor. Swap one into the trike and then the other. Plug the phase and hall plugs in and it's good to go.
Weight difference between the two is minimal. The Bafang is 4kg and the rc system is 4.25kg +.5kg for the wheel hub 4kg and 4.75kg respectively so there's only 750 grams difference. So let's just say they weigh about the same.
Bafang weight
RC drive weight + 500g for wheel hub
Weight balance is about the same too. The rc drive has its weight centred more in the trikes frame but a little higher up in the frame. The Bafang motor sits with 50% of its weight below the axle line and 50% above but to the rear of the trike. The bafang gives me the ability to place the battery behind the seat where the rc drive would have been, so in the end I think the Bafang would have the edge for weight balance. But for now when riding the trike the seat of the pants feeling is very similar.
Pic of RC drive
Pic of Bafang BPM in identical sun rim and tyre to rc drive
For my test they are both being fed 15s 25c 10ah pack of lipo 58 - 60v and driven from the same 12 fet 45A controller so around 2500w max. Some will say 2500w will kill the Bafang but I have tested it and under general riding with bursts of power when you need it the motor is only warm after a 10km ride. The gears and the motor in general are given a much easier life when laced into a little 20" wheel and I think this is the key.
This weekend I will have a chance to repeat previous rides that I did with the rc system that I have extensive data on already. I can then compare the two in detail and post up the results. I will also include things like DB reading at different speeds for people concerned about sound.
Anyhow I just think this is going to be a great chance to test the two very different yet similar in a lot of respects. They are both fixed gear reduction and both free wheeling and identical weight. Tested under identical conditions. How a comparison experiment should be conducted really I think.
Don't take this next two videos as a fair comparison, they are just interesting pre test fun videos.
from the 45sec mark. This is a video of a little section of road that I took footage off with the trike at 60v 45A START THE VIDEO FROM THE 45 SECOND MARK
[youtube]ehN5pbE16o4[/youtube]
This is the identical section of road starting and stopping at the same point and following the same track. Bafang BPM 60v 45A. Now why it isn't a equal comparison is I was also towing a child trailer with my daughter so an extra 32kg holding me back!!!! The extra drag of two more wheels and the wind drag is considerable. Interestingly the bpm was only 4 seconds slower 2:14 vs 2:18 over the same track. That's not bad considering there is a HUGE incline on the test track and I am towing a trailer and extra person. I will do the same test without the trailer on the weekend I think the Bafang will a little quicker.
[youtube]n2YoOJyiaSU[/youtube]
I will get back with all the data on power consumption, heat, noise by the end of the weekend when I have ridden the two 35km and then 45km test tracks. Just For kicks I will do 0-20 and 0-35mph times.
Kurt
Weight difference between the two is minimal. The Bafang is 4kg and the rc system is 4.25kg +.5kg for the wheel hub 4kg and 4.75kg respectively so there's only 750 grams difference. So let's just say they weigh about the same.
Bafang weight
RC drive weight + 500g for wheel hub
Weight balance is about the same too. The rc drive has its weight centred more in the trikes frame but a little higher up in the frame. The Bafang motor sits with 50% of its weight below the axle line and 50% above but to the rear of the trike. The bafang gives me the ability to place the battery behind the seat where the rc drive would have been, so in the end I think the Bafang would have the edge for weight balance. But for now when riding the trike the seat of the pants feeling is very similar.
Pic of RC drive
Pic of Bafang BPM in identical sun rim and tyre to rc drive
For my test they are both being fed 15s 25c 10ah pack of lipo 58 - 60v and driven from the same 12 fet 45A controller so around 2500w max. Some will say 2500w will kill the Bafang but I have tested it and under general riding with bursts of power when you need it the motor is only warm after a 10km ride. The gears and the motor in general are given a much easier life when laced into a little 20" wheel and I think this is the key.
This weekend I will have a chance to repeat previous rides that I did with the rc system that I have extensive data on already. I can then compare the two in detail and post up the results. I will also include things like DB reading at different speeds for people concerned about sound.
Anyhow I just think this is going to be a great chance to test the two very different yet similar in a lot of respects. They are both fixed gear reduction and both free wheeling and identical weight. Tested under identical conditions. How a comparison experiment should be conducted really I think.
Don't take this next two videos as a fair comparison, they are just interesting pre test fun videos.
from the 45sec mark. This is a video of a little section of road that I took footage off with the trike at 60v 45A START THE VIDEO FROM THE 45 SECOND MARK
[youtube]ehN5pbE16o4[/youtube]
This is the identical section of road starting and stopping at the same point and following the same track. Bafang BPM 60v 45A. Now why it isn't a equal comparison is I was also towing a child trailer with my daughter so an extra 32kg holding me back!!!! The extra drag of two more wheels and the wind drag is considerable. Interestingly the bpm was only 4 seconds slower 2:14 vs 2:18 over the same track. That's not bad considering there is a HUGE incline on the test track and I am towing a trailer and extra person. I will do the same test without the trailer on the weekend I think the Bafang will a little quicker.
[youtube]n2YoOJyiaSU[/youtube]
I will get back with all the data on power consumption, heat, noise by the end of the weekend when I have ridden the two 35km and then 45km test tracks. Just For kicks I will do 0-20 and 0-35mph times.
Kurt