No problem panurge if we can share our info / points of view here we all win..... i think a rv 100 would come very close to what you want.panurge said:Would like to remember me and everybody that we are in the Electric Bicycles section of the forum, and that this is the emoto's thread about the RV-120 on a specialized,
Sameridethelightning said:im still on the fence,
Wow what luck to have a spare frame, 17'' my thoughts exactly = robust/ not such a big reduction needed / bit tyre choice / belt would nice but a compromise is small stones ect off road as mentioned earlier.kiwiev said:Cool thread
I have been thinking about something like this for my Vector have 1 frame left.
I was thinking A.C. HPEV motor and Curtis controller my thoughts were 17" wheels and make up a pulley for belt to fit beside disc rotor side and leave cassette and derailer on the otherside.
The Vector can go 155mm between the drop outs. What do you Guys think?
Ps not hijacking your thread I hope.
Cheers Kiwi
kenkad said:Thought I would add that this recumbent trike project is underway. Based on a Performer Trike X. Rear boom tube was modified by Performer for this project and is in hand. Swingarms have been waterjet cut (6061 1/2 inch plate). Uses a Revolt RV100-Pro motor. Two stage reduction, belt first and then chain, driving disc side of rear hub. Pedaling remains as is, 30 speed. Second stage is a jackshaft thru swingarm pivot point and uses a freewheel on the jackshaft. About 40% of the machined parts are done.
Just as a note, Revolt RV100-Pro just fits inside a Al Assoc 5 inch Channel. Motor mount side plates are slotted to take up belt tension. Bearing in back motor mount plate to support motor. Uses a 135mm rear hub (10 or 12mm) and a 7mm spacer on the disc mount side so rear hub fits into a 142mm dropout and WHEEL IS CENTERED BETWEEN SPOKE FLANGES, not dished. 26 inch wheel, probably DX32 rim 32H with wider tire. SRAM Rockshox on rear swingarm.
Hopefully some students may have the opportunity to do some significant dynamic stability studies (not fully determined yet).
kenkad said:sn0wchyld,
Reason #1, keeps motor rotating clockwise rather than counterclockwise. Reason #2, smaller reductions per stage keeps more teeth engaged on the smaller pulley/cog. Reason #3, and most important, puts jackshaft at the swingarm pivot, not the motor. Chain tensioning is consistent with shock travel. These were my choices.
going to use the adaptto (at least initially) so yea that shouldn't be an issue.kenkad said:Typically, Halls are not setup to rotate in either direction. Maybe this motor allows that. I did not ask Alexey that question. I only know that their videos only show CW rotation. Controller has to be able to compensate in the setup. I have not decided on a sine controller yet. What are you going to use?
Interesting...kenkad said:Alexey from Revolt said i could post this info. Additional 100-Pro dimensions (PDF) and Bemf waveforms (good sine wave).
Rotation info would be good to find out as it would give more flexable mounting options.kenkad said:Typically, Halls are not setup to rotate in either direction. Maybe this motor allows that. I did not ask Alexey that question. I only know that their videos only show CW rotation.
sn0wchyld soon as you have some pics / performance data... post away.sn0wchyld said:going to use the adaptto (at least initially) so yea that shouldn't be an issue.
kenkad said:Typically, Halls are not setup to rotate in either direction.