eMark
100 kW
For the 3rd time now I had no idea your fb friend was a wife as her last name is not the same as yours (begins with either a Q or G as i best remember). She had posted what i considered an interesting landscape photo of the limestone bluffs along the Mississippi that attracted my eye. My career in photojournalism, landscape photography and a photography instructor (vocational high school, 2-yr technical college, adult extension classes). At the time my PM mentioning your fb friends landscape photo and professional drone youtube of your beautiful city resulted in a PM from you saying it "made my day".
It was only several days later that you decided to spin a mistruth and post on an ES thread (with name calling) that i had taken a picture of your wife. I never made a copy as i already have more beautiful photos than i need to or care to sell or available wall space to display. Also as previously mentioned i had no interest in ever returning to your fb page being you are so hyper. If you don't want others to know your full name why didn't you just use tomjasz when posting three times in that "ElectricBike-Blog.com" article instead of using your real first and last name.
Tom you are a better person than to continue with posts that grossly misrepresent my PM. It's as if the real axe you're grinding is because FWIW it's AOK to buy a UPP battery for casual riding enjoyment rather than spend twice as much or more for a EM3ev battery when raw performance riding is not what turns my crank. My two UPPs serve me well. One has over 350 cycles with good capacity still remaining. My other two (18650 experimental and 21700 salvaged) serve a useful purpose for my casual ebiking requirement. Yes both of my UPPs have cells glued together to save space with vibration surrounding protection. Granted i agree with you that gluing cells in a tight honeycomb arrangement is not as you say "acceptable" for high performance packs fabricated by EM3ev or Grin Technologies.
It was only several days later that you decided to spin a mistruth and post on an ES thread (with name calling) that i had taken a picture of your wife. I never made a copy as i already have more beautiful photos than i need to or care to sell or available wall space to display. Also as previously mentioned i had no interest in ever returning to your fb page being you are so hyper. If you don't want others to know your full name why didn't you just use tomjasz when posting three times in that "ElectricBike-Blog.com" article instead of using your real first and last name.
Tom you are a better person than to continue with posts that grossly misrepresent my PM. It's as if the real axe you're grinding is because FWIW it's AOK to buy a UPP battery for casual riding enjoyment rather than spend twice as much or more for a EM3ev battery when raw performance riding is not what turns my crank. My two UPPs serve me well. One has over 350 cycles with good capacity still remaining. My other two (18650 experimental and 21700 salvaged) serve a useful purpose for my casual ebiking requirement. Yes both of my UPPs have cells glued together to save space with vibration surrounding protection. Granted i agree with you that gluing cells in a tight honeycomb arrangement is not as you say "acceptable" for high performance packs fabricated by EM3ev or Grin Technologies.
