ok, so i have another idea just ripe for shooting down
I have been thinking all the way that a direct drive would be the simplest way to drive the rear wheel instead of last years crank setup, but always had a niggling feeling that the 80t extron would be better on the rear (still with you on the monster btw Etard, this is just an avenue i want to explore first).
i want to revert to an idea a while back of breaking Matts reduction unit down to suit my needs (** hears kim start to cry**)
I want to know if you see guys see anything wrong with this setup:
mount the 80t extron to the sickbikes eno - no problem there have all i need already.
mount the "foot" to the bottom of the seatpost - ive tried now and it does fit without impedeing the suspension
Retain the foot complete with bearing tube (needs adjusting to line chains) and retain the shaft which already has an 11t engineered onto it.
ask Matt VERY nicely to make me a new motor arm that is longer than the current arm so that i can drop the motor below the swingarm but attach it back to the bearing tube as before, no need for extra brackets!!!
here are a few pics to help explain and show the clearences, remember the current pulley is something like 64t which could be smaller as i only need 2-1 reduction.
the only issue i may have (apart from the dreaded chain tension) is the depth of the 3220, so i may stick with a 3210 IF this is a workable soution to my drive/suspension issues
I have fitted cranks to ensure that this is all doable and they just pass, once the tube is adjusted and the pulley a little smaller everything does indeed fit so .....
Do you guys think that three clamps around the seatpost (2 yet to be drilled and tapped in the foot) would suffice to hold it steady?
Also, what are your suggestions for size of pulleys to get my 2-1 reduction? 4kw power
Can i still use the GT belts at the same width?
ok im ready throw the spanners!!!!
D